ASSEMBLY 165: Poor wording in descriptions of TestCases ASM_8009 & ASM_8018- Updated Proposal

[Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com>]

Folks,

Here is an updated proposal for Issue
165.

The idea here is that testcases ASM_8009_TestCase
and ASM_8018_TestCase each test one aspect of assertion ASM-TA-8011 

8009 tests the reference aspect of ASM-TA-8011,
while 8018 test the service aspect.
- this clarifies the apparent redundancy
of 8018 mentioned in previous discussions of this issue.

With this in mind, here is my amended
description text for these 2 testcases:

8009

Tests that where the <interface/>
element of a reference in the componentType of an implementation does not
declare a callback interface, 
then the corresponding reference element
of the component using the implementation also does not declare a callback
interface in its <interface/> subelement

8018

Tests that where the <interface/>
element of a service in the componentType of an implementation does not
declare a callback interface, 
then the corresponding service element
of the component using the implementation also does not declare a callback
interface in its <interface/> subelement



Yours,  Mike.

Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014    Mobile: +44-7802-467431  
Email:  mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com

---

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU