sca-assembly message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sca-assembly] NEW ISSUE: TEST_ASM_12001 empty composite name
- From: Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com>
- To: OASIS Assembly <sca-assembly@lists.oasis-open.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 09:24:58 +0000
Logged as: http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-205
Yours, Mike.
Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014 Mobile: +44-7802-467431
Email: mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com
From:
| Jim Marino <jim.marino@gmail.com>
|
To:
| OASIS Assembly <sca-assembly@lists.oasis-open.org>
|
Date:
| 11/01/2010 18:17
|
Subject:
| [sca-assembly] NEW ISSUE: TEST_ASM_12001
empty composite name |
TARGET: SCA Assembly Conformance Tests
DESCRIPTION:
TEST_ASM_12001 in TestConfiguration provides an empty
composite name (the test attempts to verify that all deployables in a composite
are deployed if no composite is specified). Besides being a dubious test
(it relies on the runtime bridge and runtime deployment API to do this),
it demonstrates Testconfiguration is not intuitive as the composite to
run comes from multiple sources in TestConfiguration.
SVN Version: 426
PROPOSAL:
Refactor the RuntimeBridge and TestConfiguration
API. A proposal was started here:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-assembly/200912/msg00043.html
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]