sca-assembly message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: [ASSEMBLY 140] Need TAs and testcases for property/@file and property/@many=true- PROPOSAL
- From: Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com>
- To: "OASIS Assembly" <sca-assembly@lists.oasis-open.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:24:01 +0000
Folks,
I've looked at this one and my proposal
is to Close with No Action.
The reason that there are no TAs and
no testcases for property/@file and for property/@many is that
there are no normative statements for
either of them.
The basic rule that we have followed
so far is that Normative statement --> TA --> testcase.
No normative statement, no TA.
This makes it straightforward to relate
each testcase and each TA to some specific part of the spec.
I am unwilling to change this principle.
So, if it is really important to have
TAs and testcases here, then it is also important to have some normative
statements. In that case, someone
should raise issue(s) against the Assembly spec for those normative
statements.
I note that in practice, @many is going
to get itself a testcase related to the normative statement ASM50044,
which will be dealt with under ASSEMBLY
159.
Yours, Mike.
Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014 Mobile: +44-7802-467431
Email: mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]