[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sca-assembly] eventing & policies
Hi Eric: I wanted to acquaint you with our thinking, such as it is, on eventing and policies. I also wanted to say that I'm sceptical of policies on channels. I was not commenting on other aspects of your note, so go ahead and raise the issue. All the best, Ashok Eric Johnson wrote: > Hi Ashok, > > Since the point you raise seems to apply whatever approach we take > towards eventing, it seems like that is a separate issue that you or I > should raise, and doesn't really affect the question of whether or not > we should open the issue in question. > > Did I miss something? > > -Eric. > > On 05/13/2010 12:30 PM, ashok malhotra wrote: > >> Hi Eric: >> Re. policies the eventing spec merely carries over what the assembly >> says about policies on services/references >> to producers/consumers. I'm not sure this is correct. We need to >> think some more about policies in the eventing >> situation. At one time I thought you could apply policies only to >> producers and consumers could accede to the >> producers policies or lump it. But there are event models in the >> database world where there is one producer and >> one consumer (tell me if IBM stock trades for over $100) and in such >> cases it does make sense for the consumer >> and producer to match policies. >> >> The problem I see with policies on channels is that the channel can >> act as an aggregator for events from from >> several producers, so what policies does it employ?> >> >> All the best, Ashok >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]