Re: [sca-assembly] NEW ISSUE: (v 1.2) Section 11 of spec should be marked non-normative

["Eric Johnson" <eric@tibco.com>]

I chose not to open that door. Amendments welcome!

Eric

On Feb 14, 2011, at 5:55 PM, "Anish Karmarkar" <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> wrote:

> Isn't this a 1.1 issue?
> 
> -Anish
> --
> 
> On 2/14/2011 4:01 PM, Eric Johnson wrote:
>> Title: Section 11 of spec should be marked non-normative
>> 
>> Target: Assembly 1.2 WD 03
>> 
>> Description:
>> 
>> Section 11 of the specification (Extension model) contains no normative
>> statements. As a small help to those trying to understand the
>> specification, marking the text in some way as "non-normative" will help
>> consumers of the spec understand that this section is merely describing
>> ways of extending the spec, with no impositions on implementation.
>> 
>> Proposal:
>> 
>> Add a parenthetical "(Non-Normative)" to the section heading.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
>> generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
>> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php