OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

sca-assembly message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Issue-245: Adopt the WS-RA Event Description specification to declareSCA Event Types

We may now be able to resolve http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-245


From: Bob Freund [mailto:bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com]
Sent: 28 April 2011 19:42
To: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org
Subject: Fwd: Seven Web Services Specifications are Candidate Recommendations (Call for Implementations)


Congratulations, it is done.


Begin forwarded message:

From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>

Date: April 28, 2011 1:53:01 PM EDT

To: W3C Members <w3c-ac-forum@w3.org>

Subject: Seven Web Services Specifications are Candidate Recommendations (Call for Implementations)


Dear Advisory Committee Representative,

I am pleased to announce that the Web Services Resource Access Working Group released a set of W3C Candidate Recommendations.  See below for the full list of documents. There are no "features at risk" in these Candidate Recommendations.

The approval and publication is in response to the following transition request:

The disposition of Last Call comments is available both for reviews from
outside the Working Group:

and within the Working Group:

There was one Formal Objection; see details below.

This Call for Implementations follows section 7.4.3 of the W3C Process
 Document: http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr#cfi

For Tim Berners-Lee, Director,
Thomas Roessler, Technology and Society Domain Lead, and
Yves Lafon, Web Services Activity Lead;
Ian Jacobs, Head of W3C Communications

========== Candidate Recommendations ============



WS-Metadata Exchange


WS-Event Description


WS-SOAP Assertion

===== Formal Objection =====

There was one Formal Objection [1] regarding a potential c! onflict between the WS-I profile used and the WS-Addressing specification.  Discussion of that Objection within the Working Group led to new technical issues which were resolved. The Formal Objection was not withdrawn, but the reviewer provided a notice [2] that his organization did not want to delay the specification's progress.

After discussion, the Director decided that the implementation concerns require careful testing to minimize interoperability issues when a mismatch happens.

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Jun/0014.html
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2010Dec/0023.html

Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org)    http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/
Tel:                                      +1 718 260 9447


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]