Re: [sca-assembly] Issue-245: Adopt the WS-RA Event Description specificationto declare SCA Event Types

[Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>]

This is good news, especially the part where it says that there are no 
features "at risk".

-Anish
--

On 4/29/2011 6:55 AM, Martin Chapman wrote:
> We may now be able to resolve http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-245
>
> *From:* Bob Freund [mailto:bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com]
> *Sent:* 28 April 2011 19:42
> *To:* public-ws-resource-access@w3.org
> *Subject:* Fwd: Seven Web Services Specifications are Candidate
> Recommendations (Call for Implementations)
>
> Congratulations, it is done.
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>
>
> *Resent-From: *w3c-ac-members@w3.org <mailto:w3c-ac-members@w3.org>
>
> *From: *Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org <mailto:ij@w3.org>>
>
> *Date: *April 28, 2011 1:53:01 PM EDT
>
> *To: *W3C Members <w3c-ac-forum@w3.org <mailto:w3c-ac-forum@w3.org>>
>
> *Subject: Seven Web Services Specifications are Candidate
> Recommendations (Call for Implementations)*
>
> Dear Advisory Committee Representative,
>
> I am pleased to announce that the Web Services Resource Access Working
> Group released a set of W3C Candidate Recommendations. See below for the
> full list of documents. There are no "features at risk" in these
> Candidate Recommendations.
>
> The approval and publication is in response to the following transition
> request:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2011AprJun/0015
>
> The disposition of Last Call comments is available both for reviews from
> outside the Working Group:
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?product=WS-Resource%20Access&version=LC&keywords=externalComments
> <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?product=WS-Resource%20Access&version=LC&keywords=externalComments>
>
> and within the Working Group:
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?product=WS-Resource%20Access&version=LC&keywords
> <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?product=WS-Resource%20Access&version=LC&keywords>
>
> There was one Formal Objection; see details below.
>
> This Call for Implementations follows section 7.4.3 of the W3C Process
> Document: http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr#cfi
>
> For Tim Berners-Lee, Director,
> Thomas Roessler, Technology and Society Domain Lead, and
> Yves Lafon, Web Services Activity Lead;
> Ian Jacobs, Head of W3C Communications
>
> ========== Candidate Recommendations ============
>
> WS-Transfer
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/CR-ws-transfer-20110428/
>
> WS-Fragment
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/CR-ws-fragment-20110428/
>
> WS-Metadata Exchange
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/CR-ws-metadata-exchange-20110428/
>
> WS-Eventing
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/CR-ws-eventing-20110428/
>
> WS-Event Description
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/CR-ws-event-descriptions-20110428/
>
> WS-Enumeration
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/CR-ws-enumeration-20110428/
>
> WS-SOAP Assertion
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/CR-ws-soap-assertions-20110428/
>
> ===== Formal Objection =====
>
> There was one Formal Objection [1] regarding a potential c! onflict
> between the WS-I profile used and the WS-Addressing specification.
> Discussion of that Objection within the Working Group led to new
> technical issues which were resolved. The Formal Objection was not
> withdrawn, but the reviewer provided a notice [2] that his organization
> did not want to delay the specification's progress.
>
> After discussion, the Director decided that the implementation concerns
> require careful testing to minimize interoperability issues when a
> mismatch happens.
>
> [1]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Jun/0014.html
> [2]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2010Dec/0023.html
>
>
> --
> Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org <mailto:ij@w3.org>) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/
> Tel: +1 718 260 9447
>
>
>