sca-assembly message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Draft minutes from 2012-01-24 are attached
- From: Robert Freund <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com>
- To: "[SCA-Assembly]" <sca-assembly@lists.oasis-open.org>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:05:10 -0500
Title: SCA-Assy - 2012-01-24
Hide Chat
Action Items
- Done:
- id=2011-11-29-1 status=done Mike E to contribute a write up of the IBM position on the current proposals
- Pending:
- id=2010-09-22-8 status=pending owner="EricJ" produce new proposal for ASSEMBLY-227
- id=2011-07-19-1 status=pending Booz to prepare a clean wd working draft for future publication
- id=2011-08-02-2 status=pending Karmarkar to do a 2119 fly-specing job on the 1.2 spec and generate a proposal
- id=2011-08-23-1 status=pending Version 1.2 editors to apply the resolution of Assembly-141 to 1.2
- id=2011-12-06-2 status=pending owner="EricJ" Work up initial proposal for ASSEMBLY-247
- id=2012-01-17-1 status=pending Peter to write up his ideas for Assembly-239
Minutes
Opening
Roll 9 of 16 voting members present
Resolution: minutes of 2012-01-17 approved w/o
Action Items
Action: id=2010-09-22-8 status=pending owner="EricJ" produce new proposal for ASSEMBLY-227
Action: id=2011-07-19-1 status=pending Booz to prepare a clean wd working draft for future
publication
Action: id=2011-08-02-2 status=pending Karmarkar to do a 2119 fly-specing job on the 1.2 spec
and generate a proposal
Action: id=2011-08-23-1 status=pending Version 1.2 editors to apply the resolution of Assembly-141
to 1.2
Action: id=2011-11-29-1 status=done Mike E to contribute a write up of the IBM position on
the current proposals
Action: id=2011-12-06-2 status=pending owner="EricJ" Work up initial proposal for ASSEMBLY-247
Action: id=2012-01-17-1 status=pending Peter to write up his ideas for Assembly-239
Open Issues against the 1.2 Spec
<Mike Edwards>
Mike's missive:
<Mike Edwards>
rather than "interoperability" I get the feeling that Eric was talking about "Portability"
<Mike Edwards>
if there is no Portability then I'd agree that there is a problem here
<Mike Edwards>
but it is not with Bindings per se, but rather with the basic Event Processing architecture
itself
<Mike Edwards>
I don't see that from Eric's email
<Mike Edwards>
I can see the need for suitable Policy mechanics
Time warning four minutes
AOB
[End of Minutes]
Formatted on 2012-01-31 at 10:03:33 GMT-5
Minutes formatted by Schreiber, a collection of XSLT
stylesheets by Bob Freund modeled after David Booth's scribe
Schreiber diagnostics output
[Delete this section before publishing the minutes]
final validation: Date not specified, the date '2012-01-24' was assumed
final validation: Title not specified, default title 'OASIS SCA-Assembly TC...' was
assumed
final validation: Chair not specified, default chair was assumed
statistics: Schreiber found 22 input lines
edits: Schreiber found no text-edit commands
command-scribe: Line 10: Bob Freund is recognized
command-scribe: Line 10: Bob Freund's first nick in the participants file has been
selected since the scribename command was entered by a nick other than one of Bob
Freund's known nicks
system: Transformer: SAXON EE 9.3.0.5
[End of Schreiber diagnostic output]
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]