Since I believe the TC has decided that issues applying to multiple
specifications should treat each specifications separately, I will file
this bug as three different issues - unless someone objects.
-Eric.
Simon Holdsworth wrote:
OF5D031004.59841C39-ON802574D3.0040ECE2-802574D3.0041C3A9@uk.ibm.com"
type="cite">
TARGET: SCA JMS, WS and JCA Binding
Specifications CD-01
DESCRIPTION:
Resolution of ASSEMBLY-79 adds
wireFormat
and operationSelector elements to the base binding element. All
bindings
specifications need to be updated to describe those elements in the
context
of the particular binding, and to present the default behaviour where
specified
as specific elements.
In addition we should consider
whether
additional wireFormats should be added to each specification, or across
specifications. One very common example would be wireFormat.xml,
which could apply to more than one binding.
PROPOSAL:
Add wireFormat and operationSelector
elements to binding pseudo-schemas in all binding specifications, with
the descriptions pointing back to the bindings section in the assembly
spec.
Modify the sections of the JMS and
JCA
binding spec that talk about data binding and operation resolution to
refer
to the wireFormat and operationSelector elements
Reword the default operation
selection
and data binding sections in terms of the wireFormat and
operationSelector
elements, and define the default behaviour as specific
wireFormat.xxxbindingdefault
and operationSelector.xxxbindingdefault elements.
Regards, Simon
Simon Holdsworth
STSM, SCA Bindings Architect; Master Inventor; OASIS SCA Bindings TC
Chair
MP 211, IBM UK Labs, Hursley Park, Winchester SO21 2JN, UK
Tel +44-1962-815059 (Internal 245059) Fax +44-1962-816898
Internet - Simon_Holdsworth@uk.ibm.com
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with
number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
|