[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sca-bindings] Attempt #4 at WSDL binding
Eric Johnson wrote: > Hi Anish, > > Anish Karmarkar wrote: >> Eric Johnson wrote: >>> Hi Anish, >>> >>> Anish Karmarkar wrote: >>> >>> [snip - At the risk of having removed too much context from the >>> discussion.] >>>> The bigger question, is do we want our default binding to be >>>> interoperable, if yes, then we should stick to BP conformance with >>>> some minimal exceptions. Anything else, define your own WSDL binding. >>>> >>>>> If you think this really is an error, is seems that the assembly >>>>> specification must state something normative about how interface.wsdl >>>>> portTypes cannot be any odd WSDL 1.1 portType, but they must be WS-I >>>>> BP 1.2 compliant portTypes. But I don't think it should. >>>> I don't think we need to go that far. If someone wants to do BP >>>> non-compliant portType they can, but they have to define their own >>>> bindings. Don't rely on defaults. >>> That sounds like a decent approach. I'll have to think about it more >>> prior to our next meeting, but it seems like a reasonable constraint - >>> if the portType is not compatible with BP 1.2, then the user must >>> explicitly provide their own binding. >>> >> Ok. If we agree on that, then the only issue would be about whether to >> allow rpc/literal or not for the default bindings. If we want to allow >> it, we'll have to provide a SCA-defined default namespace for the rpc >> wrapper element and the part accessors. > My take is that we should allow it - we've been talking about supporting > it up until now, so yes, we need that namespace identifier. > I'm ok with that. I had suggested before that if we want to allow rpc/literal then we provide a *fixed* NS URI. I'm beginning to think that a fixed NS URI that is used by everyone may not be a good idea. Instead we might want to use the hierarchical URI associated with the component and add "service-name/binding-name" to it. What do you think? -Anish --
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]