sca-bindings message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Issues with proposed resolutions - prep for our calls in December
- From: Simon Holdsworth <simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com>
- To: sca-bindings@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:47:03 +0000
Folks,
The following issues currently have
proposed resolutions in one form or another. I'd appreciate it if
the folks who are idenfied as the issue owners could take a look at these
and refresh their memories of the issues/resolutions before the calls:
Open issues with proposed resolutions:
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-51
WS Binding spec needs RFC 2119 language
Raiser: Dave Booz, owner: Editors (Anish
Karmarkar)
Status: Current proposed text in http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/29727/sca-binding-ws-1.1-spec-cd01-rev2.doc
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-52
JMS Binding needs RFC 2119 language
Raiser: Dave Booz, owner: Editors (Simon
Holdsworth)
Status: Current proposed text in http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/29684/sca-binding-jms-1.1-spec-cd01-rev1.doc
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-53
JCA Binding needs RFC 2119 language
Raiser: Dave Booz, owner: Editors (Piotr
Pryzybylski)
Status: Current proposed text in http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/29718/sca-binding-jca-1.1-spec-cd01-rev2.doc
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-2
How should SCA callback semantics be
carried over Web Services?
Raiser: Simon Nash, owner: Anish
Karmarkar
Status: Proposed resolution: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200810/msg00088.html
Latest email: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200810/msg00091.html
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-11
"Formal" WSDL generation is
unclear, ambiguous, and incomplete
Raiser: Eric Johnson, owner: Eric
Johnson, Anish Karmarkar
Status: Latest email: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200810/msg00012.html
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-31
What is a "plain name" for
a connection factories or activation specs, and how is one distinguished
from a JNDI name?
Raiser: Eric Johnson, owner: Simon
Holdsworth
Status: Updated proposal in email http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200810/msg00013.html
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-40
Clarify rules around combination of
destination, CF and AS elements
Raiser: Simon Holdsworth, owner: Simon
Holdsworth
Status: Latest email: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200810/msg00077.html
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-44
Update binding.jms spec for wireFormat/operationSelection
elements
Raiser: Simon Holdsworth, owner: Simon
Holdsworth
Status: Latest email: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200810/msg00073.html
Also these issues don't have proposed
resolutions; any proposals for these would be gratefully received (before
1st December ideally):
Open issues with identified resolution
owner:
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-7
JMS bindingType and ordered intent -
clarification needed
Raiser: Peter Peshev, owner Simon
Holdsworth
Status: Awaiting decision on POLICY-60.
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-21
Support for callback and conversation
ID-s in bindings
Raiser: Peter Peshev, owner Peter
Peshev
Status: Proposed resolution in issue
Notes: As for BINDINGS-2, this is waiting
for clarification around conversations at the assembly level
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-43
Update binding.ws spec for wireFormat/operationSelection
elements
Raiser: Simon Holdsworth, owner: Anish
Karmarkar
Status: Specific resolution text required.
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-45
Update binding.jca spec for wireFormat/operationSelection
elements
Raiser: Simon Holdsworth, owner: Piotr
Przybylski
Status: Specific resolution text required.
Open issues with no identified resolution
owner:
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-22
Bindings specifications should provide
exemplary Implementations for Callbacks and Conversations
Raiser: Mike Edwards
Status: No proposed resolution
Notes: As for BINDINGS-2, this is waiting
for clarification around conversations at the assembly level
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-23
@wsdlElement definition needs clarification
on "equivalent" and use of WSDL 2.0 constructs
Raiser: Eric Johnson
Status: Specific resolution text required
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-24
Which wire did a message arrive on?
Raiser: Sanjay Patil
Status: Waiting for examples from Sanjay
as per 20080717-4
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-25
Is it required that every implementation
of binding.ws support the soap intent?
Raiser: Anish Karmarkar
Status: No current proposal. Latest
email: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200807/msg00006.html
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-29
Properties on Bindings
Raiser: Piotr Przybylski
Status: No current proposal; defer until
Policy 15 (External Attachment) is resolved
Thanks, Simon
Simon Holdsworth
STSM, SCA Bindings Architect; Master Inventor; OASIS SCA Bindings TC Chair
MP 211, IBM UK Labs, Hursley Park, Winchester SO21 2JN, UK
Tel +44-1962-815059 (Internal 245059) Fax +44-1962-816898
Internet - Simon_Holdsworth@uk.ibm.com
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]