Re: [sca-bindings] Question on application of BINDINGS-44 resolution

[Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>]

Simon Holdsworth wrote:
> 
> Folks,
> 
> I have a question on the resolution of issue BINDINGS-44 (Update 
> binding.jms spec for wireFormat/operationSelection elements)
> 
> The resolution text includes introduction of new elements:
> 
> <wireFormat.jmsdefault>
> <operationSelector.jmsdefault>
> 
> However these are only mentioned in the text, there is no schema 
> definition for these.  
> 
> Should there be an update to the schema to define these two elements? 
>  If so I'd imagine the following needs adding to the binding.jms schema:
> 
>   <element name="wireFormat.jmsdefault" type="sca:WireFormatType" 
> substitutionGroup="sca:wireFormat"/>
>   <element name="operationSelector.jmsdefault" 
> type="sca:OperationSelectorType" 
> substitutionGroup="sca:operationSelector"/>
> 
> Also as per the naming conventions issue I suspect that these ought to 
> be called:
> 
> <wireFormat.jmsDefault>
> <operationSelector.jmsDefault>
> 

I know the naming convention does not say anything about element/type 
names that contain acronyms, but to be consistent with the convention 
for intents, shouldn't acronyms in elements/types be uppercase too?

-Anish
--

> A side note: the current Assembly CD draft refers to the default JMS 
> wire format as <sca:wireFormat.jms>
> 
> Regards, Simon
> 
> Simon Holdsworth
> STSM, SCA Bindings Architect; Master Inventor; OASIS SCA Bindings TC Chair
> MP 211, IBM UK Labs, Hursley Park, Winchester SO21 2JN, UK
> Tel +44-1962-815059 (Internal 245059) Fax +44-1962-816898
> Internet - Simon_Holdsworth@uk.ibm.com
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> /
> /
> 
> /Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
> 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>