[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sca-bindings] ISSUE 55: WSDL 2.0
I may have missed some discussion. I was surprised to see this:
"This specification only defines a binding using WSDL 1.1, but does not prohibit a future specification defining a binding for WSDL 2.0."
I was expecting to see this:
This specification only defines a binding using WSDL 1.1, but does not prohibit a vendor from extending the binding to support WSDL 2.0.
The first statement doesn't really say anything since future specs are free to change whatever they want anyway. I would have thought that the important point to address was around concerns that the binding was limited to 1.1 in the presence of a WSDL 2.0 spec, and therefore we need to leave the door open for vendors to go there if they want to.
Dave Booz
STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture
Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC
"Distributed objects first, then world hunger"
Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093
e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com
Bryan Aupperle---02/02/2009 02:23:59 PM---Draft b based on last week's discussion Bryan Aupperle, Ph.D.
From: | Bryan Aupperle/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS |
To: | sca-bindings@lists.oasis-open.org |
Date: | 02/02/2009 02:23 PM |
Subject: | [sca-bindings] ISSUE 55: WSDL 2.0 |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]