Re: [sca-bindings] Issue 2: policy assertion proposal v1

[Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com>]

Folks,

We've been down this road before.

I'll be voting against the creation
of a separate specification for this under the stewardship of
any of the SCA TCs.


Yours,  Mike.

Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014    Mobile: +44-7802-467431  
Email:  mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com

From:	Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
To:	OASIS Bindings <sca-bindings@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date:	12/02/2009 07:24
Subject:	[sca-bindings] Issue 2: policy assertion proposal v1

---

Attached.
I have crafted the proposal in the form of a separate spec, just to 
demonstrate how a separate spec that combines the callback protocol, 
callback protocol policy assertion, and the wsdl extension for callback
may look like. Although the attached doc only contains the policy 
assertion and not the protocol or the wsdl extension for callback.

The relevant part is in section 2 of the document and appendix A. I'll
reproduce the pseudo-schema and the attachment points in WSDL 1.1 below:

<sca:CallbackAssertion [wsp:Optional="true"]? ... >
   ...
</sca:CallbackAssertion>

Policy subject: Endpoint
Can be attached to wsdl:port and/or wsdl:binding

Comments?

-Anish
--
[attachment "SCA-bindings-issue2-policy-assertion-v1.doc" deleted
by Mike Edwards/UK/IBM] ---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

---

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU