Attempt at conformance numbering for binding.jms

[Simon Holdsworth <simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com>]

Folks,

Here's my attempt at doing conformance
numbering for the JMS binding spec, based on the CD02 version.  I've
not made this revision 1 of the cd as I think that would imply that we
were all happy with the changes, and I'm pretty sure there will be some
debate about what I've done in a few places.

I have followed the SCA Assembly approach
in terms of referencing the text and statement number in each direction.
 I have tried to highlight the changes I have made in the statements
in the table in appendix B; unfortunately this means that the cross-reference
text in the document body is a strange halfway house - so please review
the text as it is in the appendix, and once that's accepted the cross-references
can be updated to look right.

My main concerns with the update are
around places where there are multiple conformance statements that rely
on some shared context - in most cases I've had to repeat some text for
each statement.  The one place I stopped short was in the default
wire format, it just looks like I would need to have too much repetition
to have each case as a seperate conformance statement.

Anyway, here's the document, I would
really appreciate some input as I think we need to agree these changes
so that I can proceed with the other issue resolutions.



Thanks, Simon

Simon Holdsworth
STSM, SCA Bindings Architect; Master Inventor; OASIS SCA Bindings TC Chair
MP 211, IBM UK Labs, Hursley Park, Winchester SO21 2JN, UK
Tel +44-1962-815059 (Internal 245059) Fax +44-1962-816898
Internet - Simon_Holdsworth@uk.ibm.com

---

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU

sca-binding-jms-1.1-spec-cd02-issue62.doc