[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Issue 2 proposal v13
Attached. Included Dave's inlined changes, addressed his comments (except the ones related to URI values -- see my response to his email), fixed indentation of examples, fixed one UUID for request messages (in the examples) to make them all unique, addressed all of SimonN's comments. Looking at v13, there are a few things that are worded in an awkward way, since the origin of this proposal lies in trying to get a directional proposal so that the TC could agree on the protocol elements/how it works. But we have moved on to agreeing on exact wordings. I think this is purely editorial and can be fixed later (as PR comments) so won't bother with making/suggesting any changes now. With this, I believe all the outstanding comments except one (see below) are addressed. I'm hoping we can resolve issue 2 with this. The only outstanding issue is whether to change 'SCA reference' to something like 'the invoker' or 'the client' so that non-SCA clients can use it. -Anish --
SCA-bindings-issue2-proposal-v13.doc
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]