Re: [sca-bindings] Issue 25: updated proposal

[Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com>]

Simon Holdsworth wrote:
> 
> Anish,
> 
> My only comment is that on line 354/355 the statement "MUST comply with 
> all the applicable requirements specified in Section 2 of this 
> specification"  limits all <binding.ws> xml document normative 
> statements to section 2 - I'm not sure why we limit this to section 2 only.
> 
Satisfying only the section 2 statements isn't sufficient.  The document
also needs to satisfy conformance statement BWS40004.  Perhaps this
statement is misplaced and should be moved to section 2.

One other minor nit: in section 5.1 (second paragraph), the [ASSEMBLY]
reference should be [SCA-Assembly].

   Simon

> Regards, Simon
> 
> Simon Holdsworth
> STSM, SCA Bindings Architect; Master Inventor; OASIS SCA Bindings TC Chair
> MP 211, IBM UK Labs, Hursley Park, Winchester SO21 2JN, UK
> Tel +44-1962-815059 (Internal 245059) Fax +44-1962-816898
> Internet - Simon_Holdsworth@uk.ibm.com
> 
> 
> *Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>*
> 
> 16/04/2009 21:24
> 
> 	
> To
> 	OASIS Bindings <sca-bindings@lists.oasis-open.org>
> cc
> 	
> Subject
> 	[sca-bindings] Issue 25: updated proposal
> 
> 
> 	
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Attached.
> 
> 1) Made changes that SimonN had pointed out in his email (typos, removal
> of 'optional' etc).
> 2) Made changes based on Eric's feedback (removed constraining type,
> reduced redundancy by combining multiple stmts.
> 3) Gave a name to the schema.
> 4) Modeled the conformance section per the Java CAA spec [1] conformance
> section (as SimonN had pointed out on the call):
> a) defined two categories of artifacts for conformance
> b) added authoritativeness of schema that is pointed to by the RDDL doc.
> c) moved the requirement for <binding.ws>'s conformance to schema to
> section 2
> d) changed the requirement on the runtime to not just reject docs
> containing <binding.ws> that do not conform to the schema but also to
> any additional constrains in the spec that are not captured by the schema.
> 
> Please do send me comments and I'll try to incorporate them before out
> next call.
> 
> -Anish
> --
> 
> [1]
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-j/download.php/31814/sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev4.pdf 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
> 
> #### sca-binding-ws-1.1-spec-cd02_issue25-proposal-v2.doc moved to 
> MyAttachments Repository V3.8 (Link 
> <Notes:///802570AC003DC246/5DE5236E5AD1645685256EE0001BBADF/640BB90DE925BF158025759E0036CB77>) 
> on 20 April 2009 by Simon Holdsworth.
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> /
> /
> 
> /Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
> 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>