[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sca-bindings] Issue 25: updated proposal
Simon Nash wrote: > Simon Holdsworth wrote: >> >> Anish, >> >> My only comment is that on line 354/355 the statement "MUST comply >> with all the applicable requirements specified in Section 2 of this >> specification" limits all <binding.ws> xml document normative >> statements to section 2 - I'm not sure why we limit this to section 2 >> only. >> I listed only section 2 here as I didn't think there was any other section that had anything of relevance wrt conformance as it applies to the target SCA WS Binding XML document. Section 1 is introduction, section 3 is examples and section 4 is all about defaults (which are applicable to the runtime not the XML document). This is what section 4 says: "This section describes the defaults to be used if the specific transport details are not otherwise specified." But we could change the sentence as follows: s/Section 2 of// so that the sentence would read: "An SCA WS Binding XML document MUST be a conformant SCA Composite Document or a SCA ComponentType Document, as defined by the SCA Assembly specification [SCA-ASSEMBLY], and MUST comply with all the applicable requirements specified in this specification." The term 'applicable requirements' restricts it to requires that apply to the XML document target in any case. > Satisfying only the section 2 statements isn't sufficient. The document > also needs to satisfy conformance statement BWS40004. Perhaps this > statement is misplaced and should be moved to section 2. > Perhaps it should be. But I think if we remove words "Section 2 of", as suggested above, we would future-proof the spec with any requirements that apply to XML documents being added to sections other than section 2 at some later point in time. > One other minor nit: in section 5.1 (second paragraph), the [ASSEMBLY] > reference should be [SCA-Assembly]. > Agreed. Will fix it. -Anish -- > Simon > >> Regards, Simon >> >> Simon Holdsworth >> STSM, SCA Bindings Architect; Master Inventor; OASIS SCA Bindings TC >> Chair >> MP 211, IBM UK Labs, Hursley Park, Winchester SO21 2JN, UK >> Tel +44-1962-815059 (Internal 245059) Fax +44-1962-816898 >> Internet - Simon_Holdsworth@uk.ibm.com >> >> >> *Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>* >> >> 16/04/2009 21:24 >> >> >> To >> OASIS Bindings <sca-bindings@lists.oasis-open.org> >> cc >> >> Subject >> [sca-bindings] Issue 25: updated proposal >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Attached. >> >> 1) Made changes that SimonN had pointed out in his email (typos, removal >> of 'optional' etc). >> 2) Made changes based on Eric's feedback (removed constraining type, >> reduced redundancy by combining multiple stmts. >> 3) Gave a name to the schema. >> 4) Modeled the conformance section per the Java CAA spec [1] conformance >> section (as SimonN had pointed out on the call): >> a) defined two categories of artifacts for conformance >> b) added authoritativeness of schema that is pointed to by the RDDL doc. >> c) moved the requirement for <binding.ws>'s conformance to schema to >> section 2 >> d) changed the requirement on the runtime to not just reject docs >> containing <binding.ws> that do not conform to the schema but also to >> any additional constrains in the spec that are not captured by the >> schema. >> >> Please do send me comments and I'll try to incorporate them before out >> next call. >> >> -Anish >> -- >> >> [1] >> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-j/download.php/31814/sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev4.pdf >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that >> generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: >> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php >> >> #### sca-binding-ws-1.1-spec-cd02_issue25-proposal-v2.doc moved to >> MyAttachments Repository V3.8 (Link >> <Notes:///802570AC003DC246/5DE5236E5AD1645685256EE0001BBADF/640BB90DE925BF158025759E0036CB77>) >> on 20 April 2009 by Simon Holdsworth. >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> / >> / >> >> /Unless stated otherwise above: >> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with >> number 741598. >> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 >> 3AU/ >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]