Re: [sca-bindings] Groups - sca-binding-jca-1.1-spec-cd02-issue63.docuploaded

[Bryan Aupperle <aupperle@us.ibm.com>]

Overall this looks good, but some comments
on BJC20001, BJC20002 and BJC20003.

BJC20001 covers BJC20002 so BJC20002
should be removed.

BJC20001 should be expanded to cover
BJC20003 and BJC20003 removed.

Piotr, before I propose new wording
for BJC20001, the spec points out that @uri is mutually exclusive with
either @connectionInfo or a [inbound|outbound].connection element.  It
the separately states that @jndiURL should not be used with @uri.  I
take this to mean that @uri and @jndiURL are mutually exclusive.  Are
@jndiURL and either @connectionInfo or a [inbound|outbound].connection
element mutually exclusive?  What about @connectionInfo and a [inbound|outbound].connection
element?

Separately, the conformance section
should be restructured along the lines that Anish is proposing for the
WS binding spec.

Bryan Aupperle, Ph.D.
STSM, WebSphere Enterprise Platform Software Solution Architect

Research Triangle Park,  NC 
+1 919-254-7508 (T/L 444-7508)
Internet Address: aupperle@us.ibm.com

simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com

04/08/2009 05:31 AM

To	sca-bindings@lists.oasis-open.org
cc
Subject	[sca-bindings] Groups - sca-binding-jca-1.1-spec-cd02-issue63.doc uploaded

The document named sca-binding-jca-1.1-spec-cd02-issue63.doc
has been
submitted by Mr. Simon Holdsworth to the OASIS Service Component
Architecture / Bindings (SCA-Bindings) TC document repository.

Document Description:


View Document Details:
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=31989

Download Document:  
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/31989/sca-binding-jca-1.1-spec-cd02-issue63.doc


PLEASE NOTE:  If the above links do not work for you, your email application
may be breaking the link into two pieces.  You may be able to copy
and paste
the entire link address into the address field of your web browser.

-OASIS Open Administration