Updated proposal for bindings 54.
Changes:
- Added new conformance statement at the definition of @uri
- Removed proposed conformance statement from the definition of
endpointReference (moved to @uri)
- Section 2.2 - two new paragraphs talking about the treatment of
URIs for bindings on a service.
- (Simon N) - Fixed establishs --> establishes typo
- (Simon N) - Change "as defined as under the definition" to "as
specified under the definition".
- (Simon N) - Change "by port element" to "by the port element"
- (Simon N) - Removed "In both of the above cases, the SCA runtime
MUST raise an error if there is not at least one port compatible with
runtime policies and constraints". This assumes that resolution to
BINDINGS-23 passes.
-
Under 2.2, list item #1, replaced sentence - "The @wsdlElement
attribute, if present MUST NOT reference anything other than a
wsdl:binding element" with "The @wsdlElement attribute, if present,
cannot reference anything other than a wsdl:binding element", as the
normative statement is redundant with conformance statement under @uri.
- (Simon N) - list item #3, removed sentence - "In both of the
above cases, the SCA runtime MUST raise an error if there is not at
least one port compatible with runtime policies and constraints." - as
this is presumed to be redundant subsequent to resolution of BINDINGS-23
- (Simon N) - Change "reference a URIs" to "a reference URI"
- (Simon N) - Changed the conformance statement at the very end of
section 2.2 to be a "MUST", not a "SHOULD".
This completes my action item 20090507-2
Special thanks to Simon Nash for catching all the typos in my previous
revision.
-Eric.
|