Re: [sca-bindings] Another revision of proposal to resolve issue54 - #10

[Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com>]

Thanks, Eric.

This version looks good to me.

   Simon

Eric Johnson wrote:
> Attached you should find the revised proposal for issue 54 - attempt #10
> 
> Changes:
> 
>     * Under "endpointReference" definition in section 2, deleted the
>       second sentence that starts "When this element is present...", as
>       we decided this was redundant with the new normative statement.
>     * Replaced reference to "runtime" with "SCA runtime" where I had
>       left it unqualified.
>     * Updated the normative statement at the end of section 2 to use the
>       bullet point construction that Anish suggested.
>     * Updated the first paragraph under section 2.2 with the agreed-upon
>       text from the chat room - except that I felt it necessary to tweak
>       the last sentence a little further.  Specifically, I came up with
>       "For example, the service endpoint URI might be produced by
>       modifying any or all of the host name, the port number, and a
>       portion of the path."  What we had in the chat room didn't quite
>       work for me.
>     * Updated the third paragraph in section 2.2 with the alternate text
>       Simon N. proposed in his email
>       <http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200905/msg00086.html>.
> 
> -Eric.
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php