Re: [sca-bindings] [Issue 2] Inlined proposal v5

[David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com>]

+1

In addition to Mike's point 2, the 3rd paragraph also seems normative.

Dave Booz
STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture
Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC
"Distributed objects first, then world hunger"
Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093
e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com

Mike Edwards ---06/18/2009 06:25:33 AM---Folks, First, thanks for Anish for preparing a thorough revision of the proposal.

From:	Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com>
To:	OASIS Bindings <sca-bindings@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date:	06/18/2009 06:25 AM
Subject:	Re: [sca-bindings] [Issue 2] Inlined proposal v5

---

Folks, 

First, thanks for Anish for preparing a thorough revision of the proposal. 

Comments: 

1) [BWS50005] mentions [BWS50003] but BWS50003 no longer exists.  I believe that [BWS50002] should be referenced instead. 

2) It is surprising that the "SCA Web Services Callback with WS-MakeConnection Protocol" section has no normative statements 
I feel that the 2nd paragraph could well have "MUST adhere to" instead of "has to adhere to".   
The 5th paragraph also sounds normative, and "the callback request message is sent as the response" could well be rendered 
as "the callback request message MUST be sent as the response". 

3) The normative statements in Assertion Attachment section read somewhat clumsily and in some ways miss the real point, which is 
contained in the last paragraph.  I wonder if some rewording might make things clearer and more straightforward, such as: 

"Policy Subjects allowed for a WSCallback policy assertion and which can have WSCallback policy assertions attached 
MUST be contained within the scope of the following set of WSDL 1.1 elements: 
•        wsdl:port 
•        wsdl:binding" [BWS500xx] 



Editorial comments: 

a) The references to examples in Appendix E should have hyperlinks in the text. 

b) I'd be happier with references to other specs combining the name of the document and the short form reference tag, such 
as [WS-Addr]. 


Yours,  Mike.

Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014    Mobile: +44-7802-467431  
Email:  mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com

From:	Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
To:	OASIS Bindings <sca-bindings@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date:	18/06/2009 09:41
Subject:	[sca-bindings] [Issue 2] Inlined proposal v5

---

Attached.

This proposal consists of taking the inlined proposal v4 produced by 
MikeE [1] and applying it to CD02 rev4. On top of that I have made the 
following changes (based on the last call where we discussed v4):
1) Included a pointer to the appendix examples from section 5.2
2) Missing 2119 statement tags are added.
3) Fixed cross-references and 2119 stmt highlighing.
4) Deleted all the MAY statements that were unnecessary.
5) Replaced lowercase 2119 keywords with appropriate non-keyword substitutes
6) Made the protocol composable with WS-MC without introducing 
additional conformance points.

-Anish
--

[1] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200905/msg00098.html
[attachment "sca-binding-ws-1.1-spec-cd02-rev4-issue2_v5.doc" deleted by Mike Edwards/UK/IBM] [attachment "sca-binding-ws-1.1-spec-cd02-rev4-issue2_v5.pdf" deleted by Mike Edwards/UK/IBM] ---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

---

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU