Re: [sca-bindings] JMS binding - optional binding property name

[Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>]

I think this is a bug. I don't know what it would mean to have a 
property without a name.

-Anish
--

Simon Laws wrote:
> 
> As of JMS binding spec CD02 Rev 6 the BindingProperty structure is 
> defined as:
> 
> 922 <complexType name="BindingProperty">
> 923   <simpleContent>
> 924     <extension base="string">
> 925       <attribute name="name" type="NMTOKEN"/>
> 926       <attribute name="type" type="string" use="optional"
> 927       default="xs:string"/>
> 928     </extension>
> 929   </simpleContent>
> 930 </complexType>
> 
> Is the "name" attribute intentionally optional?
> 
> If so, is it valid to have an element, such as destination, with more 
> than one property with no name?
> 
> Regards
> 
> Simon
> 
> Simon Laws
> Open Source SOA Development
> tuscany.apache.org
> Mail Point 146, Hursley Park, Winchester, Hampshire, SO21 2JN
> Tel: Internal 248708  External +44 (0)1962 818708
> Email: simon_laws@uk.ibm.com
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> /
> /
> 
> /Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
> 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>