bindings xsd files, RDDL file update, diff files

[Simon Holdsworth <simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com>]

Folks,

Some questions about the cd03 packages:

XSD availability

In the Assembly CD03 package, the bindings
xsd files are named:

sca-binding-jca-1.1-cd02.xsd
sca-binding-jms-1.1-cd02.xsd
sca-binding-ws-1.1-cd02.xsd

Within the binding cd03 spec documents,we
refer to these schema without the -1.1-cd02 suffix (or indeed, -1.1-cd03).
I assume that's OK and that's what Assembly does, although I think the
title of the XML schema appendix would be more accurately named to include
the -1.1 suffix, ie. "sca-binding-XXX-1.1.xsd"

Within the Assembly CD03 package, the
RDDL file references these three bindings xsd files, however when I look
at http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/opencsa/sca/200903, the HTML file does
not include links to  any bindings XSD files except for binding.sca;
 those that it does reference are qualifed with -1.1-cd03.  Note
that the following URL does work: http://docs.oasis-open.org/opencsa/sca-assembly/sca-binding-ws-1.1-cd02.xsd,
although its not linked from the RDDL file.

So, as part of the publication of the
bindings specs, I believe we need to ensure that:

1) The binding spec packages include
.xsd files extracted from the documents and renamed to -1.1-cd03.xsd (these
already refer to the cd03 assembly namespace and core xsd file)
2) These xsd files are made available
at  http://docs.oasis-open.org/opencsa/sca-assembly/
3) The RDDL file at http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/opencsa/sca/200903
is updated to include these three .xsd files

Is this something that we can do purely
from the bindings group, or do we need the Assembly TC to agree/action
this?

cd02 diff files:

The assembly cd03 package includes a
cd02-cd03-diff file for .doc, .html and .pdf, however those files are not
available on docs.oasis-open.org.  I assume these are in the package
for the TC's convenience, I'll include that in the bindings packages.

Previous version links:

I notice that assembly cd03 refers to
the previous version by pointing at the Assembly TC document store, not
to docs.oasis-open.org.  I assume that's because cd02 was never formally
published.  Currently the bindings specs have previous version set
to cd01, which was published.  Should we be pointing at the unpublished
cd02 from the binding specs via the document store, or just leave as is
pointing at cd01?

Regards, Simon

Simon Holdsworth
STSM, SCA Bindings Architect; Master Inventor; OASIS SCA Bindings TC Chair
MP 211, IBM UK Labs, Hursley Park, Winchester SO21 2JN, UK
Tel +44-1962-815059 (Internal 245059) Fax +44-1962-816898
Internet - Simon_Holdsworth@uk.ibm.com

---

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU