OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

sca-bindings message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [sca-bindings] JCA TA Document proposal - wd02

I have revised some of the tags, changed to the correct terms for the prescription levels (preferred/permitted instead of optional) and clarified the wording of BJC-TA-20008 and BJC-TA-20014 in [3,4].

[3] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/34114/sca-jcabinding-1.1-test-assertions-wd03.doc
[4] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/34115/sca-jcabinding-1.1-test-assertions-wd03.pdf

Some additional comments below... <bea>...</bea>

Bryan Aupperle, Ph.D.
STSM, WebSphere Enterprise Platform Software Solution Architect

Research Triangle Park,  NC
+1 919-254-7508 (T/L 444-7508)
Internet Address: aupperle@us.ibm.com

From: David Booz/Poughkeepsie/IBM@IBMUS
To: sca-bindings@lists.oasis-open.org
Date: 09/09/2009 09:51 AM
Subject: [sca-bindings] JCA TA Document proposal - wd02

I've taken a pass at the TA document for the JCA binding. You can find them at [1,2]. Items to note:

1) JCA CD03 spec - line 138 and 186 - What does restrict mean?  
<bea> Piotr will have to comment on this. </bea>

2) JCA CD03 spec - lines 154-155 should probably be normative
<bea> I agree.  I'll raise an issue. </bea>

3) To my untrained JCA eyes, BJC20007 and BJC20008 are contradictory? Same question for BJC20013 and BJC20014. If they are not contradictory, some please explain it to me.
<bea> Subtle corner case:  BJC20007 covers only those managed connection factories  used within a domain while I believe that BJC20008 deals with the case where there are potentially additional managed connection factories defined outside of a given domain (say by another domain or outside of SCA).  It may be OK to reuse the connection factory, or it may not. The same is true for BJC20013 and BJC20014. Perhaps BJC20008 and BJC20014 need to be clarified.</bea>

4) I have no idea what to specify for tags in each TA

5) Not sure that BJC-TA-20016 is even remotely close to correct
<bea> I think this is OK </bea>


Dave Booz
STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture
Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC
"Distributed objects first, then world hunger"
Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]