Re: [sca-bindings] ISSUE-91: BWS20004 incorrectly talks about 'availableports for the reference' rather than '... reference binding'.

[Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com>]

Logged as: http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-91

Anish Karmarkar wrote:
> Resending. Forgot to include '[NEW ISSUE]' in the subject field.
>
> -Anish
> -- 
>
>
> Title: BWS20004 incorrectly talks about 'available ports for the
> reference' rather than '... reference binding'.
>
> Description:
> BWS20004 states:
>
> If the wsdl.service form of wsdlElement is used on an SCA reference
> binding, the set of available ports for the reference MUST contain at
> least one port.
>
> The available ports are for the specific reference binding not for the
> reference, which may contain alternate bindings.
>
> Proposal:
>
> Replace BWS20004 text with:
>
> If the wsdl.service form of wsdlElement is used on an SCA reference
> binding, the set of available ports for *that* reference *binding* MUST
> *be non-empty*.