OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

sca-bindings message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Raw chat log of 2009-11-05 telcon


Simon Holdsworth: Agenda:

Simon Holdsworth: 1. Opening

Introductions
Roll call
Scribe assignment

Top of the scribe list:
Plamen Pavlov SAP AG
Piotr Przybylski IBM
Tom Rutt Fujitsu Limited
Ashok Malhotra Oracle Corporation
Martin Chapman Oracle Corporation
Khanderao Kand Oracle Corporation
Bryan Aupperle IBM
Anish Karmarkar Oracle Corporation
Eric Johnson TIBCO Software Inc.
David Booz IBM

Agenda bashing

2. Approval of the minutes from 15th October

http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/34729/SCA%20Bindings%20minutes%202009-10-15.doc 


3. Actions

20090211-4 [General] Write up HTTP binding use cases
20090709-2 [Editors] Update the schema appendix title to include 1.1
20090820-2 [Simon Holdsworth] Look at the templating mechanism with 
respect to policy.
20091001-2 [Bryan Aupperle] Get Piotr to respond to comments on 
proposals for issue BINDINGS-88 and BINDINGS-89
20091015-1 [Anish Karmarkar] Raise new issues found during TA creation 
for obvious bugs in WS binding spec
20091015-2 [Simon Holdsworth] Scan minutes for disposition of each point 
and generate a response to the comment and AIs as necessary
20091015-3 [Editors] Re: BINDINGS-99 point #1 - review and determine 
appropriate update to copyright dates (all specs)
20091015-4 [Editors] Re: BINDINGS-99 point #2 - clarify the text 
describing the JCA binding (JCA only)
20091015-5 [Editors] Re: BINDINGS-99 point #3 - revise text to reword or 
remove as appropriate (JCA only)
20091015-6 [Editors] Re: BINDINGS-99 point #5 - caption all examples, 
figures, snippets, etc., scrub text of use of former, latter, above, 
below, following. Replace with precise references (all specs)
20091015-7 [Editors] Re: BINDINGS-99 point #6 - clean up the text with 
regards to this item (JCA only)
20091015-8 [Editors] Re: BINDINGS-99 point #8 - look at whether the 
non-normative references section is relevant still, or needs to be 
populated (all specs)
20091015-9 [Editors] Re: BINDINGS-99 point #9 - clean up naming 
conventions section (all specs)
20091015-10 [Editors] Re: BINDINGS-99 point #10 - look for cleanup to 
clarify optionality (all specs)
20091015-11 [Editors] Re: BINDINGS-99 point #11 - do something to 
clarify the different uses for the @uri attribute (JCA only)
20091015-12 [Editors] Re: BINDINGS-99 point #16 - mark Annexes as 
normative or not as appropriate (all specs)

4. Holiday Meetings

Discuss meetings of Nov 26, Dec 24, Dec 31

5. New Issues

No new issues in JIRA; on mailing list:

What is the purpose of definitions/binding element?
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200911/msg00000.html

No defined behaviour in JMS binding if resolved operation name not 
present in interface
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200911/msg00003.html

Incorrect closing element in JMS pseudo-schema
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200911/msg00009.html

6. Test Assertions/Test cases

Current status:

Web Service binding TA document:
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/34571/sca-wsbinding-1.1-test-assertions-wd02.odt 

http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/34572/sca-wsbinding-1.1-test-assertions-wd02.pdf 

Status: Draft completed; needs review

JMS TA document:
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/34706/sca-jmsbinding-1.1-test-assertions-wd03.doc 

http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/34707/sca-jmsbinding-1.1-test-assertions-wd03.pdf 

Status: Latest draft needs review.

JCA TA document:
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/34114/sca-jcabinding-1.1-test-assertions-wd03.doc 

http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/34115/sca-jcabinding-1.1-test-assertions-wd03.pdf 

Comment: 
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200909/msg00011.html
Status: reviewed and issues raised.

7. Open issue discussion

Public review comment issues:

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-99
Patrick Durusau - 2009-10-07 - Comments on sca-jcabinding-1.1-spec.pdf
Raiser: Public review comment, owner: unassigned
Priority: 1 (PR comment needing disposition)
Status: Proposed resolution: 
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200910/msg00054.html

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-100
Simon Holdsworth - 2009-10-07 - Comments on bindings specs
Raiser: Simon Holdsworth, owner: Simon Holdsworth
Priority: 1 (PR comment needing disposition)
Status: Proposed resolution: 
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200910/msg00053.html

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-87
Web Service callback standard is best done by the appropriate Web 
Services working groups
Raiser: PR comment, owner: Unassigned
Priority: 1 (PR comment needing disposition)
Status: latest email: 
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200911/msg00001.html

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-97
confusing statement on correlation ID in the context of callbacks with 
JMS binding
Raiser: Public review comment, owner: Simon Holdsworth
Priority: 1 (PR comment needing disposition)
Status: Proposed resolution: 
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200911/msg00004.html

Other open issues:

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-88
JCA Missing Normative statements re: connection/@name 
andactivationSpec/@name
Raiser: Bryan Aupperle, owner: Unassigned
Priority: Unassigned
Status: proposed resolution in issue
Latest email: 
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200910/msg00002.html

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-89
BJC20008 and BJC20014 are unclear
Raiser: Bryan Aupperle, owner: Unassigned
Priority: Unassigned
Status: proposed resolution in issue
Latest email: 
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200910/msg00003.html

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-93
BJM60006 too vague and conflicts with other statements
Raiser: Simon Holdsworth, owner: Simon Holdsworth
Priority: Unassigned
Status: Proposed resolution in JIRA
Latest email: 
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200910/msg00000.html

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-94
scaCallbackDestination destination name unclear
Raiser: Simon Holdsworth, owner: Simon Holdsworth
Priority: Unassigned
Status: Proposed resolution in email: 
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200911/msg00008.html

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-95
BJM30032 and BJM30035 conflict
Raiser: Simon Holdsworth, owner: Simon Holdsworth
Priority: Unassigned
Status: Proposed resolution in JIRA
Latest email: 
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200911/msg00010.html

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-96
BJM60012 and BJM60013 conflict
Raiser: Simon Holdsworth, owner: Simon Holdsworth
Priority: Unassigned
Status: Proposed resolution in JIRA

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-103
optional used in normative statement
Raiser: Simon Holdsworth, owner: Simon Holdsworth
Priority: Unassigned
Status: Proposed resolution in JIRA

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-104
Expected @create attribute value not clear in some normative statements
Raiser: Simon Holdsworth, owner: Simon Holdsworth
Priority: Unassigned
Status: Proposed resolution in JIRA

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-105
BJM30025 has no normative keyword
Raiser: Simon Holdsworth, owner: Simon Holdsworth
Priority: Unassigned
Status: Proposed resolution in JIRA
Latest email: 
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200911/msg00010.html

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-106
BJM30027 has no normative keyword
Raiser: Simon Holdsworth, owner: Simon Holdsworth
Priority: Unassigned
Status: Proposed resolution in JIRA
Latest email: 
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200911/msg00010.html

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-101
Opaque references - need for a terminology list?
Raiser: PR comment, owner: Unassigned
Priority: Unassigned
Status: no proposed resolution

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-102
Need to specify all valid enumerations for @create attribute and others
Raiser: PR comment, owner: Unassigned
Priority: Unassigned
Status: no proposed resolution

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-60
JMS Default wire format insufficient to cover real world usage
Raiser: Mike Edwards, owner: Simon Holdsworth
Priority: 3 (deferred)
Status: outline proposal in issue

8. AOB

anish: Scribe: Anish Karmarkar

anish: Topic: Action

anish: 20091015-2 is done

anish: All others are still pending

anish: Topic: Holiday meetings

anish: Meetings on TG, Christmas and NY

anish: (Nov 26, Dec 24, Dec 31)

anish: The three calls on Nov 26, Dec 24, Dec 31 are canceled

anish: Action: chair to cancel the three calls in KAVI

anish: Plamen joins and the meeting is now quorate

anish: Topic: Approval of the minutes from 15th October

anish: 
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/34729/SCA%20Bindings%20minutes%202009-10-15.doc

anish: No objections to approving the minutes as posted

anish: Resolution: minutes of 15th oct accepted

anish: Topic: new issue 107

anish: What is the purpose of definitions/binding element?
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200911/msg00000.html

Eric Johnson: http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-107

anish: Motion: anish moves dave seconds to open issue 107

anish: motion passes w/o

anish: ACTION: anish to open an issue against JMS which is similar to 107

anish: Topic: new issue 108

anish: No defined behaviour in JMS binding if resolved operation name 
not present in interface
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200911/msg00003.html

anish: http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-108

anish: SimonH explains the issue

anish: motion: m:eric s:mikeE to open issue 108

anish: motion approved w/o

anish: proposal fro 108 --

anish: Modify BJM40010 as follows:

When a message is received at an SCA service with JMS binding, the SCA 
runtime MUST invoke the target component using the resolved operation 
name if that name is present in the target component's interface, 
otherwise the SCA runtime MUST raise an error [BJM40010].

anish: s/fro /for /

Simon Holdsworth: When a message is received at an SCA service with JMS 
binding, the SCA runtime MUST invoke the target component using the 
resolved operation name

Dave Booz: current words: When a message is received at an SCA service 
with JMS binding, the SCA runtime MUST invoke the target component using 
the resolved operation name [BJM40010].

anish: Dave: in the past we have broken up statements with two MUST

anish: ... as it creates issues with TAs

Simon Holdsworth: Alternatively add the following statmenet: "When a 
message is received at an SCA service with JMS binding, if the resolved 
operation name is not in the target component's interface the SCA 
runtime MUST raise an error [BJM400XX]."

anish: simon: if we go with this, would we want to change the other stmt 
as well so that they match

anish: Dave: yes

Simon Holdsworth: Update to existing: When a message is received at an 
SCA service with JMS binding and the resolved operation name is in the 
target components interface, the SCA runtime MUST invoke the target 
component using the resolved operation name [BJM40010].

anish: motion: m: dave s:mikeE resolve 108 with the following:

anish: Update to existing: When a message is received at an SCA service 
with JMS binding and the resolved operation name is in the target 
components interface, the SCA runtime MUST invoke the target component 
using the resolved operation name [BJM40010].

anish: and add a new:

anish: "When a message is received at an SCA service with JMS binding, 
if the resolved operation name is not in the target component's 
interface the SCA runtime MUST raise an error [BJM400XX]."

anish: motion approved w/o

anish: Topic: new issue 109

anish: ncorrect closing element in JMS pseudo-schema
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200911/msg00009.html

anish: http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-109

anish: Simon: typo in closing tag

anish: motion: m:eric s:mikeE to open issue 109

anish: motion approved w/o

anish: motion: m:eric s:mikeE to resolve 109 with proposal in JIRA

anish: motion approved w/o

anish: Topic: issue 99

anish: http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-99
Patrick Durusau - 2009-10-07 - Comments on sca-jcabinding-1.1-spec.pdf
Raiser: Public review comment, owner: unassigned
Priority: 1 (PR comment needing disposition)
Status: Proposed resolution: 
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200910/msg00054.html

anish: Simon walks through his proposed resolution

anish: anish: i think the ibm lawyers already checked this and it is ok

anish: mike: yes we did

anish: ... assembly spec does the same

anish: ... it can predate existence of the TC

anish: (the above refers to the copyright issue)

anish: Eric: it would be beneficial if we summarized (like 3 no actions, 
3 new issues etc)

anish: ... we should also provide links to the issues that are raised

anish: ... identifying the editorial AIs by our internal tracking numbers

anish: s/identifying/and identify/

anish: motion: m:mikeE s:dave close issue 99 with no change to the spec, 
with an action to send a response in 
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200910/msg00054.html 
(modulo changes to item 1 related to copyright, and 3 comments from Eric)

anish: motion approved w/o

anish: Action: simon to send a response to the raiser of issue 99 as 
outlined in
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200910/msg00054.html 
(modulo changes per the issue closing motion)

anish: Topic: issue 100

anish: http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-100
Simon Holdsworth - 2009-10-07 - Comments on bindings specs
Raiser: Simon Holdsworth, owner: Simon Holdsworth
Priority: 1 (PR comment needing disposition)
Status: Proposed resolution: 
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200910/msg00053.html

anish: simon walks through his proposed resolution

anish: anish: for the ws-spec how about: The relevant web service 
specifications have a way to figure out the operation. For example 
WS-Addressing wsa:Action SOAP header block

anish: motion: m:anish s:mikeE resolve issue 100 with no change to the 
spec and an action to simon to send a response per 
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200910/msg00053.html 
(after cleaning it up)

anish: motion approved w/o

anish: meeting adjourned


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]