Re: [sca-bindings] BINDINGS-118: BWS40005 is ambiguous

[Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com>]

All right, now that it is logged, I can be first to comment....

This seems obvious to me, and potentially easy to over specify.  The
introductory paragraph to section 4 already spells out possibilities. 
Do the possibilities need to be specified as part of the normative
statement?

Is there really an issue here?

-Eric.


On 02/10/2010 05:56 PM, Eric Johnson wrote:
> Logged as: http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-118
>
> -Eric.
>
> On 02/10/2010 04:33 PM, Anish Karmarkar wrote:
>   
>> Title: BWS40005 is ambiguous
>>
>> Spec: WS Binding
>>
>> Description:
>> BWS40005 says --
>> "In the event that the transport details are not otherwise determined,
>> an SCA runtime MUST enable the default transport binding rules."
>>
>> It is not clear as to under what conditions the transport details are
>> not otherwise determined   
>>
>> Proposal:
>>
>> List the conditions that lead to this.
>>
>>
>> -Anish
>>     
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 
>
>