[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sca-bindings] Issue-126
I think what you want to say is: "binding.ws MUST be capable of recognizing and processing WS-Policy syntax and semantics." (and I would add WSDL 1.1. attachment semantics too). If you say "recognizing and processing *policies expressed* ..." then you are required to recognize individual policies expressed in any/all WS-Policy assertions that may be present". no? -Anish -- On 4/15/2010 10:45 AM, ashok malhotra wrote: > Hi Eric: > My suggestion was not to change the height of the bar but merely to > clarify what "WS-Policy support" means. > I don't see a difference between your words and mine. I'm fine with the > following > "binding.ws MUST be capable of recognizing and processing policies > expressed in WS-Policy syntax". > All the best, Ashok > > > Eric Johnson wrote: >> Hi Ashok, >> >> That sounds like an even higher bar. >> >> Do you mean "be capable of recognizing and processing policies ..." >> >> -Eric. >> >> On 04/15/2010 10:05 AM, ashok malhotra wrote: >>> Suggest we replace "support WS-Policy" with "recognize and process >>> policies expressed in WS-Policy syntax" >>> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]