Re: [sca-bindings] Issue-126

[ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>]

Yes, but what is expressed in WS-Policy syntax are policies, n'est-ce pas?

All the best, Ashok


Anish Karmarkar wrote:
> I think what you want to say is:
> "binding.ws MUST be capable of recognizing and processing WS-Policy 
> syntax and semantics." (and I would add WSDL 1.1. attachment semantics 
> too).
>
> If you say "recognizing and processing *policies expressed* ..." then 
> you are required to recognize individual policies expressed in any/all 
> WS-Policy assertions that may be present". no?
>
> -Anish
> -- 
>
> On 4/15/2010 10:45 AM, ashok malhotra wrote:
>> Hi Eric:
>> My suggestion was not to change the height of the bar but merely to
>> clarify what "WS-Policy support" means.
>> I don't see a difference between your words and mine. I'm fine with the
>> following
>> "binding.ws MUST be capable of recognizing and processing policies
>> expressed in WS-Policy syntax".
>> All the best, Ashok
>>
>>
>> Eric Johnson wrote:
>>> Hi Ashok,
>>>
>>> That sounds like an even higher bar.
>>>
>>> Do you mean "be capable of recognizing and processing policies ..."
>>>
>>> -Eric.
>>>
>>> On 04/15/2010 10:05 AM, ashok malhotra wrote:
>>>> Suggest we replace "support WS-Policy" with "recognize and process
>>>> policies expressed in WS-Policy syntax"
>>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
>> generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
>> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php