Logged as http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-138
Eric.
On 09/23/2010 04:58 AM, Simon Holdsworth wrote:
OF18EFE627.610A6533-ON802577A7.00404FD4-802577A7.0041A476@uk.ibm.com"
type="cite">TARGET: SCA JMS Binding
Specification cd04
TITLE: BJM30018 scope is unclear
DESCRIPTION:
BJM30018 states:
When the connectionFactory element is present,
then
the destination MUST be defined either by the destination
element or the
@uri attribute
The connectionFactory element could be present
directly
under the <binding.jms> element, or as a child of the
<response>
element. The existing statement applies when the
connectionFactory
element is a child of the <binding.jms> element, in
which case the
@uri makes sense as a place to define the destination.
However if
the connectionFactory is a child of the response element, then
there are
two ways that the response destination can be specified - via
the JMSReplyTo
header in the request message or via a destination element as
a child of
the response element.
PROPOSAL:
BJM60007 and BJM60008 already cover the
behaviour
for responses, so I think that we just need to make BJM30018
specific to
the children of <binding.jms> as follows:
When the connectionFactory element is present
as a
child of the binding.jms element the destination MUST be
defined either
by a destination element child of the binding.jms element or
by the @uri
attribute of the binding.jms element [BJM30018]
Simon Holdsworth
Unless stated otherwise
above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales
with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth,
Hampshire PO6
3AU
|