Logged as: http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-151
Please note that I took the liberty of changing:
- the title to referece BWS-TA-20029 instead of BWS-TA-2009
- the document target to
sca-wsbinding-1.1-testcases-csd01-rev1.pdf
Let me know if either of these changes were in error.
-Eric.
On 4/7/11 7:24 AM, Anish Karmarkar wrote:
4D9DC902.6050604@oracle.com" type="cite">Title:
change the status of BWS-TA-2009 BWS-TA-50010 BWS-TA-50011
Document: TestCases for the SCA Web Service Binding Specification
Description:
1) BWS20030 maps to BWS-TA-20029, TA-20029 is marked as 'optional
function -- no test'
This isn't about optionality. The conformance item isn't testable
and we should mark it as such.
2) BWS50014 maps to BWS-TA-50010 and is marked as 'optional
function -- no test'.
This isn't about optionality. The conformance item isn't worth
testing IMHO, we should mark it as such.
3) BWS50015 maps to BWS-TA-50011 and is marked as 'optional
function -- no test'.
This isn't about optionality. The conformance item isn't worth
testing IMHO, we should mark it as such.
Proposal:
Mark BWS-TA-20029 as 'untestable'
Mark BWS-TA-50010 as 'untested'
Mark BWS-TA-50011 as 'untested'
-Anish
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC
that
generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
|