sca-bindings message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: [NEW ISSUE]: Clarify optionality of SHOULD statement BJM30030
- From: Simon Holdsworth <simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com>
- To: sca-bindings@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:56:44 +0100
Target: sca-jmsbinding-1.1-csd05.pdf
Description:
The JMS binding specification includes
statement BJM30030 with a SHOULD keyword:
The SCA runtime SHOULD make the operationProperties
element corresponding to the selectedOperation available to the wireFormat
implementation [BJM30030].
We need to clarify whether this is an
optional part of the JMS binding spec.
Proposal:
I don't see the value of having this
as a normative statement as we have no direct control over implementations.
Delete this statement; add the following text to continue the previous
non-normative text on line 299: "; an SCA runtime can pass these
values to the wireFormat implementation for each message received."
Additional changes to the documents are
required:
1) Remove BJM30030 from the table
at the end of the JMS binding spec.
2) Remove test assertions BJM-TA-30030
from the JMS binding testcase specification, including entries in the tables
in Appendix B and C
---------------------------------
Simon Holdsworth
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]