sca-bindings message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sca-bindings] BINDINGS-152: BWS20027 is tested in the POJO tests
- From: Bryan Aupperle <aupperle@us.ibm.com>
- To: sca-bindings@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 13:43:23 -0400
There are three test assertions in assembly
(ASM-TA-8001, ASM-TA-8005, and ASM-TA-8006) that cannot be tested using
interface.wsdl. They are tagged in the TA document as "Language
dependent" and in the TC document table mapping the assertions to
test cases, these assertions are labeled "Language Dependent"
as well. There is no specific reference to any other document or
TC. Since we require an implementation type to define a mapping between
any interface types it defines and WSDL, it in entirely appropriate to
delegate testing of BWS-TA-20026 to the implementation types,.much
like Assembly does for ASM-TA-8001, ASM-TA-8005, and ASM-TA-8006.
So for BWS-TA-20026 we should tag them
as either "Language dependent " (identical to Assembly) or "Implementation
Type dependent" (slightly more accurate). I do not have a strong
feeling either way.
Bryan Aupperle.
Software IT Architect - Mid-Atlantic
Senior Technical Staff Member
Raleigh, NC
Mobile: 919-656-0018
aupperle@us.ibm.com
From:
Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com>
To:
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
Cc:
OASIS Bindings <sca-bindings@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date:
04/07/2011 01:27 PM
Subject:
Re: [sca-bindings]
BINDINGS-152: BWS20027 is tested in the POJO tests
Logged as: http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-152
Again, note that I changed the document to:
sca-wsbinding-1.1-testcases-csd01-rev1.pdf
-Eric.
On 4/7/11 7:02 AM, Anish Karmarkar wrote:
> Title: BWS20027 is tested in the POJO tests
>
> Document: TestCases for the SCA Web Service Binding Specification
> Version 1.1
>
> Description:
> The conformance item BWS20027 corresponds to BWS-TA-20026. The
> document marks BWS-TA-20026 as "Untestable as this requires a
specific
> non-WSDL
> interface type, and there is no mandatory support for
> such an interface type"
>
> This is not tested in the WS binding testcases as it requires a non
WSDL
> interface. But it is tested in the POJO testcases (and I assume
> C/C++). The POJO testcases do use binding.ws as well as interface.java
> together. We should just note that in the TC doc.
>
> Proposal:
> Replace the appropriate item in appendix C to point to the POJO test
> cases
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS
at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]