OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

sca-bindings message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: [BINDINGS-161]: BWS50015's target is a WSDL 1.1. document, is thatappropriate?



Folks,

I'm in favour of removing this as a normative statement.  I also note that the same issue applies both
to BWS50014 and BWS50015 so I think that this issue should deal with both of them.

So my proposal is as follows:

Replace the normative statements [BWS50014] and [BWS50015] with the following text:

"It is good practice for Policies and Assertions to be signed to prevent tampering.  It is acceptable for
an SCA runtime to reject a Policy that is not signed or where there is no associated security token
which indicates that the signer has appropriate claims for the policy."



Yours, Mike

Dr Mike Edwards  Mail Point 137, Hursley Park
STSM  Winchester, Hants SO21 2JN
SCA & Services Standards  United Kingdom
Co-Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC  
IBM Software Group  
Phone: +44-1962 818014  
Mobile: +44-7802-467431 (274097)  
e-mail: mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com  
 
 




From: Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
To: OASIS Bindings <sca-bindings@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: 12/05/2011 05:58
Subject: [sca-bindings] NEW ISSUE: BWS50015's target is a WSDL 1.1. document, is that appropriate?





Title: BWS50015's target is a WSDL 1.1. document, is that appropriate?

Spec: sca-wsbinding-1.1-spec-cd04

Description:

BWS50015 states --
Policies and assertions SHOULD be signed to prevent tampering. [BWS50014]

We haven't defined WSDL 1.1 as a conformance target. Furthermore,
policies can be inlined in a WSDL document or referenced.

Proposal:

We could go one of two ways, we could define WSDL 1.1 as a target
OR
we could refactor this to state that policy assertions ought to be
signed without using RFC2119 keywords, and add a requirement that says
that for a SCA WS Binding XML document to be conformant any policy
referenced (directly or indirectly) SHOULD be signed.
OR
we could just remove the SHOULD altogether and just talk about this
without 2119 keywords.

-Anish
--

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php









Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU








[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]