[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: raw chat log 26 may 2011
Simon Holdsworth: Participant Code: 7059536 USA Toll-Free 888-426-6840 USA Caller Paid 215-861-6239 UNITED KINGDOM Toll-Free 0800-368-0638 UNITED KINGDOM Caller Paid 0-20-30596451 Ireland Toll-Free 1-800-943-427 Ireland Caller Paid 0-1-5264424 Bulgaria Toll-Free 00800-117-4514 Other access codes can be found at: https://www.teleconference.att.com/servlet/glbAccess?process=1&accessCode=7059536&accessNumber=02030596451 Simon Holdsworth: Agenda Simon Holdsworth: 1. Opening Introductions Scribe assignment Top of the scribe list: Plamen Pavlov SAP AG David Booz IBM Martin Chapman Oracle Corporation Tom Rutt Fujitsu Limited Ashok Malhotra Oracle Corporation Bryan Aupperle IBM Eric Johnson TIBCO Software Inc. Anish Karmarkar Oracle Corporation Agenda bashing 2. Approval of the minutes from 19 May: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/42237/SCA Bindings minutes 2011-05-19.doc 3. Actions 20110310-03 [Editors] Make the change to the JMS spec doc + Testcases doc described in http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/201103/msg00007.html 20110519-01 [Simon Holdsworth] Look into whether we need a testcase for the updated normative statement in BJM60009 [following resolution of BINDINGS-157]. 4. New Issues No new issues 5. Open Issues http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-153 write new tests for TA-20021 TA-20022 TA-20028 TA-20032TA-20034 TA-20035 TA-40007 TA-50008 TA-50009 Status: Proposed resolution in JIRA 6. AOB Mike Edwards: very noisy here Mike Edwards: I can hear you Simon Ashok (Oracle): Simon: 55% of voting members present MartinC: Scribe: MartinC MartinC: Agenda: MartinC: approved as posted MartinC: Approval of the minutes from 19 May: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/42237/SCA Bindings minutes 2011-05-19.doc Simon Holdsworth: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/42237/SCA%20Bindings%20minutes%202011-05-19.doc MartinC: Approved w/o MartinC: Actions: MartinC: 20110310-03 [Editors] Make the change to the JMS spec doc + Testcases doc described in http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/201103/msg00007.html MartinC: Done MartinC: 20110519-01 [Simon Holdsworth] Look into whether we need a testcase for the updated normative statement in BJM60009 [following resolution of BINDINGS-157]. MartinC: Ongoing, but on today's agenda MartinC: New Issues: MartinC: None MartinC: Open Issues: MartinC: http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-153 write new tests for TA-20021 TA-20022 TA-20028 TA-20032TA-20034 TA-20035 TA-40007 TA-50008 TA-50009 MartinC: Anish goes over the proposal MartinC: outline of a proposal in JIRA MartinC: should [BWS20022] be made a MUST? Anish/ashok says yes - notes that doing this would imply deleting [BWS20023] MartinC: Bryan, might cause problems in a smaller/embedded environment MartinC: Anish, this is only in the context of wsdl which is probably not used in embedded environements MartinC: s/environements/environments/ MartinC: Martin: considering embedded systems would probably require a new sca profile, not just this bit MartinC: Eric: ok in an enterprise environment, but smaller environments might need other tailoring MartinC: Eric: agree to turn to a must MartinC notes my ipad has more enterprise power than a 80 mainframe Simon Holdsworth back MartinC: change to a must will require change to the test assertion and add a new test for BWS20022 - BWS20023 will be removed and ripple through - agreed in principle MartinC: [BWS20029] - should this be a must? MartinC: Simon, might be better to make non-normative MartinC: does not effect interop/portability MartinC: Martin: only effects inteop if people rely on it, but making this non-normative solves that MartinC: If this is made non-normative should also make BWS20030 non-normative MartinC: Agreed to the direction of making [BWS20029] and [BWS20030] non-normative (and associated TA) MartinC: [BWS20034]- soap 1.2 is optional but can be tested MartinC: Anish: is 1.2 so prevalent that we should require 1.2 support MartinC: Anish: direction is to add an optional test MartinC: or to make 1.2 mandatory (alongside 1.1 support) MartinC: [BWS20036] - related to previous one on use of 1.2 MartinC: should be same resolution MartinC: [BWS20037]- no test to check for soap version mismatch MartinC: Agreed in principle to add a test MartinC: [BWS40007] - do we need to add a test. its a should and it is testable MartinC: Simon: does this really have to be a normative statement or just a best practice MartinC: Eric: no fundamental interop concern, so doesn't have to be normative MartinC loves rpc-lit MartinC aka JSON MartinC: Eric: ws-i basic profile doesn't care, so why do we? MartinC: continue this discussion on email and next week MartinC: AOB: MartinC: stragglers, plamen
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]