[NEW ISSUE] WS binding RPC literal support should require specificnamespace

[Simon Holdsworth <simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com>]

Target:  sca-wsbinding-1.1-cd04.pdf

Description: 

BWS40007 is currently a SHOULD:

When using the default transport binding rules with the
rpc-literal pattern, the SCA runtime SHOULD use the structural URI associated
with the binding as the namespace of the child elements of the SOAP body
element

Which implies this is an optional feature
of the WS binding spec.  In the interest of simplifying the conformance
requirements for the binding we ought to consider whether this really needs
to be optional.   The behaviour described by the statement is necessary
for correct interoperation, and nothing is gained by using some other namespace
for the child elements of the SOAP body element,

Proposal:

Strengthen this statement to a MUST.
Either update the test case document
to state that this TA is mandatory and not tested, or mandatory and create
a new testcase.

---------------------------------

Simon Holdsworth

---

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU