Logged as: http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-164
-Eric.
On 6/7/11 4:17 AM, Simon Holdsworth wrote:
OF322F76CA.09807A62-ON802578A8.003D47EE-802578A8.003DFD8F@uk.ibm.com"
type="cite">
Target:
sca-wsbinding-1.1-cd04.pdf
Description:
BWS40007 is currently a SHOULD:
When using the default transport binding rules with
the
rpc-literal pattern, the SCA runtime SHOULD use the structural
URI associated
with the binding as the namespace of the child elements of the
SOAP body
element
Which implies this is an optional
feature
of the WS binding spec. In the interest of simplifying the
conformance
requirements for the binding we ought to consider whether this
really needs
to be optional. The behaviour described by the statement is
necessary
for correct interoperation, and nothing is gained by using some
other namespace
for the child elements of the SOAP body element,
Proposal:
Strengthen this statement to a
MUST.
Either update the test case
document
to state that this TA is mandatory and not tested, or mandatory
and create
a new testcase.
---------------------------------
Simon Holdsworth
Unless stated otherwise
above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales
with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth,
Hampshire PO6
3AU
|