OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

sca-bindings message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [sca-bindings] [BINDINGS-164] WS binding RPC literal supportshould require specific namespace

Logged as: http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-164


On 6/7/11 4:17 AM, Simon Holdsworth wrote:
OF322F76CA.09807A62-ON802578A8.003D47EE-802578A8.003DFD8F@uk.ibm.com" type="cite"> Target:  sca-wsbinding-1.1-cd04.pdf


BWS40007 is currently a SHOULD:

When using the default transport binding rules with the rpc-literal pattern, the SCA runtime SHOULD use the structural URI associated with the binding as the namespace of the child elements of the SOAP body element

Which implies this is an optional feature of the WS binding spec.  In the interest of simplifying the conformance requirements for the binding we ought to consider whether this really needs to be optional.   The behaviour described by the statement is necessary for correct interoperation, and nothing is gained by using some other namespace for the child elements of the SOAP body element,


Strengthen this statement to a MUST.
Either update the test case document to state that this TA is mandatory and not tested, or mandatory and create a new testcase.


Simon Holdsworth

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]