[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sca-bindings] [NEW ISSUE] WSCB has separate conformance pointsin the Web services specification
Not a surprise to anyone, but I prefer alternative (b). In terms of meeting the exit criteria: AIUI, Tuscany implements WSCB. There is an Oracle internal implementation that implements WSCB, I can look into whether that can be a second candidate implementation. -Anish -- On 6/8/2011 5:58 AM, Mike Edwards wrote: > > Target: sca-wsbinding-1.1-cd04.pdf > > Description: > > Sections 6.2 & 6.3 describe 2 separateconformance points within the Web > services binding specification: > > 6.2 *Web Service Callback Service* > > An implementation that claims to conform to the requirements of a WSCB > Service defined in this specification MUST conform to all the statements > in Appendix C: Conformance Items related to a WSCB Service. > > 6.3 *Web Service Callback Client* > > An implementation that claims to conform to the requirements of a WSCB > Client defined in this specification MUST conform to all the statements > in Appendix C: Conformance Items related to a WSCB Client. > > > > -- This is problematic in terms of the exit criteria and the potentially > (very) large number of combinations of runtimes required. > > Proposal: > > 2 alternatives: > > a) Remove both of these conformance points and make any SCA Runtime > implement WSCB (Client & Server) > > b) Remove WSCB as a whole into a separate specification with its own > conformance requirements. > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]