sca-bindings message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Updated status for BINDINGS-153
- From: Simon Holdsworth <simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com>
- To: sca-bindings@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:01:00 +0100
Folks, given the various open and
resolved issues here's how I see the current status of BINDINGS-153:
a) [BWS20022] and [BWS20023] map to
TA-20021 and TA-20022 and are about the using an EPR to specific the endpoint
and are marked as 'option function -- no test'.
BINDINGS-162 has deleted BWS20023 and
made BWS20022 a MUST, which is currently missing a test case and so should
still be covered by this issue.
b) [BWS20029] maps to TA-20028 and is about the use of "?wsdl"
BINDINGS-163 has removed normative statements
BWS20029 and BWS20030 so there is nothing to test here.
c) [BWS20034] maps to TA-20032 and is about optional support for WSDL 1.1/SOAP
1.2 binding
d) [BWS20036] maps to TA-20034 is also about SOAP 1.2 binding.
These two statements are the subject
of BINDINGS-168; depending on the resolution of that issue they may remain
untested.
e) [BWS20037] maps to TA-20035
Direction here was to add a test for this situation, so this is still valid
and remains in this issue.
f) [BWS40007] maps to TA-40007
BINDINGS-164 has changed BWS40007 into
a MUST; this statement is still missing a testcase.
g) [BWS50010] maps to TA-50008
h) [BWS50013] maps to TA-50009
No other issue covering these currently
mandatory statements, still missing testcases.
-----------------------------------
In summary, the statements/assertions
that are still covered by this issue, i.e. mandatory statements which are
not tested:
BWS20022 / TA-20021 mandatory statement
with no testcase; TA needs to be marked as "Mandatory" per BINDINGS-162
BWS20034 / TA-20032 pending resolution
of BINDINGS-168
BWS20036 / TA-20034 pending resolution
of BINDINGS-168
BWS20037 / TA-20035 mandatory statement
with no testcase.
BWS40007 / TA-40007 mandatory statement
with no testcase; TA needs to be marked as "Mandatory" per BINDINGS-164
BWS50010 / TA-50008 mandatory statement
with no testcase. Note: TA to testcase mapping currently marked as untestable.
BWS50013 / TA-50009 mandatory statement
with no testcase. Note: TA to testcase mapping currently marked as untestable.
Mandatory statements with no testcase
should be marked in the TA to testcase table in Appendix C as "Untested"
until a testcase implementation is submitted.
Simon Holdsworth
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]