sca-bindings message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Yet another summary for BINDINGS-153
- From: Simon Holdsworth <simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com>
- To: sca-bindings@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:08:16 +0100
Folks,
Here's the updated summary for BINDINGS-153:
BWS20022 / TA-20021 mandatory statement
with no testcase; TA needs to be marked as "Mandatory" per BINDINGS-162
BWS20034 / TA-20032 mandatory statement
with no testcase; TA needs to be marked as "Mandatory" per BINDINGS-168
BWS20036 / TA-20034 mandatory statement
with no testcase; TA needs to be marked as "Mandatory" per BINDINGS-168
BWS20037 / TA-20035 mandatory statement
with no testcase. TA to testcase mapping currently marked as untestable
rather than untested
BWS40007 / TA-40007 mandatory statement
with no testcase; TA needs to be marked as "Mandatory" per BINDINGS-164
BWS50010 / TA-50008 mandatory statement
with no testcase. TA to testcase mapping currently marked as untestable
rather than untested
BWS50013 / TA-50009 mandatory statement
with no testcase. TA to testcase mapping currently marked as untestable
rather than untested
My proposal to resolve this issue would
be to make the changes to the prescription levels as noted above and update
the seven listed test assertion to testcase mappings to be marked as "Untested".
At such time as a testcase implementation is contributed for any
of these untested TAs then the TC doc can be updated appropriately.
Further to this I looked at all the
other resolved issues against the WS binding:
BINDINGS-160: I'm not 100% clear on
the resolution here. Taken literally I believe that this resolution
replaces normative statement BWS50013 with non-normative text (the resolution
includes no RFC2119 keyword or statement number), and so the corresponding
TA needs to be removed.
BINDINGS-161: Removes BWS50014 and BWS50015,
the TA needs to be removed
Other issues either have no impact on
the testcase document, or explicitly list the changes:
BINDINGS-142: no changes to normative
statements
BINDINGS-145: no changes to normative
statements
BINDINGS-146: no changes to normative
statements
BINDINGS-148: no changes to normative
statements
BINDINGS-151: changes to TC document
are explicitly listed
BINDINGS-152: changes to TC document
are explicitly listed
BINDINGS-162: Covered by the above summary
BINDINGS-163: Covered by the above summary
BINDINGS-164: Covered by the above summary
BINDINGS-165: Appears to be a duplicate
of BINDINGS-161 with an identical resolution.
BINDINGS-166: no changes to normative
statements
BINDINGS-167: no changes to normative
statements
BINDINGS-168: Covered by the above summary
Regards, Simon
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]