NEW ISSUE: Test_BWS_2021.composite - confusing test comment

[Simon Holdsworth <simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com>]

TARGET: WS Binding Testcase artefacts

DESCRIPTION: 
As reported in public review comment: 
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings-comment/201109/msg00000.html

This XML comment in Test_BWS_2021.composite
was confusing me 

        <reference name="Reference1">
            <!-- binding.ws has a @wsdlElement
attribute with a value that points to WSDL service element 
                 and this
element has an invalid WSDL port element defined -->
                <binding.ws
uri="&ws_addr_2021;" /> 
        </reference> 

until I realized it had apparently been copied over from Test_BWS_2005.composite.
  

It also shows up in Test_BWS_2007.composite, Test_BWS_2013.composite, though
it's almost correct enough in those contexts. 

PROPOSAL:

Correct comment text in Test_BWS_2021.composite, Test_BWS_2007.composite
and Test_BWS_2013.composite to be applicable for each case, as below.

The comment for Test_BWS_2021.composite should read:

<-- binding.ws on the reference has a valid target
defined by means of its @uri attribute.  -->

For Test_BWS_2007.composite the comment should read:

<!-- binding.ws has a @wsdlElement attribute with
a value that points to WSDL port element 
     whose interface is incompatible
with that defined for the service. -->

For Test_BWS_2013.composite the comment should read:

<!-- binding.ws has a @wsdlElement attribute with
a value that points to WSDL binding element 
     whose binding type is not supported
by the SCA runtime. -->

Simon Holdsworth

---

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU