sca-bindings message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: New working draft of WS Binding Spec with hyperlinks
- From: Simon Holdsworth <simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com>
- To: sca-bindings@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 10:54:30 +0100
Folks,
In order to address an issue with navigation
in the HTML version current WS binding specification I have created a new
working draft using hyperlinks instead of cross-references for entries
in the "Normative References" and "Non-normative References"
sections.
I have also changed a small number of
references to sections and appendices to use hyperlinks.
I have not changed the cross-references
used for normative statements and their numbers. These remain as
non-navigable text in the HTML version, but can be navigated in the PDF
and Word versions. This is not too big an issue as the navigation
is just between the text and the appendix.
I also did not update the "Snippet
A.B" cross-references as these tend to appear very close to the text
they refer to and the reference is there to make sure the numbering is
correct.
Given these changes we need to decide
whether to base the CS ballot on this working draft, with an assertion
by the TC that there are no material changes, or to proceed with the CS
ballot based on the original CSPRD03 version as originally moved. My
preference would be to use this updated version of the document as the
navigation in HTML is significantly improved.
Here are the links to the updated document
and diffs in PDF and Word format:
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/49161/sca-wsbinding-1.1-spec-csprd03-rev1.doc
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/49162/sca-wsbinding-1.1-spec-csprd03-rev1-diff.pdf
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/49163/sca-wsbinding-1.1-spec-csprd03-rev1-diff.doc
The changes I made in the working draft
should all be non-material changes:
- I changed all links to references in
the document (i.e. all [....]) to use Hyperlinks rather than cross-references.
I verified that the hyperlink versions were navigable in the HTML
version of the specification.
- In addition there were a few references
to appendices and sections within the document, which I changed into Hyperlinks
to make them navigable in HTML.
- I changed the Language of the entire
document to "English (U.S.)".
Here's the detailed explanation of the
changes you see in the diff document:
Throughout the document: you'll see
"Formatted: English (U.S.). For some reason the document had
scattered through it sections which were marked as being in other languages
- Swedish, French, Netherlands amongst others. I have no idea how
that happened. While making the other changes the diff shows language
changes, so in this draft I marked the entire document and set the language
to English (U.S.) so there are many places where this change is identified
in the diff.
Page 2: change SCA-Assembly reference
to hyperlink. Here as in the rest of the document the diff shows
both the hyperlink and the cross-reference; I don't understand why the
cross-reference does not show as having been deleted, but it has.
Page 6 onwards: as with SCA-Assembly
you'll see every cross reference of the form [....] appear both as a hyperlink
and (deleted) cross-reference. You can see that the new hyperlink
has the same text as the original cross-reference
Page 6: wsoap namespace prefix - I have
no idea why Word thinks that "Defined by " was added and removed.
The text has not changed.
Page 9: line 134: Added a hyperlink
to Section 2.2
Page 10: line 204: Added a hyperlink
to Section 2.2
Page 12: line 268: Added a hyperlink
to Section 4
Page 12: line 272: Here I added a hyperlink
to Appendix A.
Page 12: line 278: This paragraph was
not formatted the same as all the others in the document, so I fixed it.
Page 18: line 482: I don't know why
this statement is marked with "Field Code Changed". I replaced
the reference to pick up the change to the embedded link, however the text
appears the same as before and navigation is correct. I've tried every
view option to see why the reference thinks the code has changed but cannot
see a difference.
Page 19: line 520: Here I replaced the
cross-reference to Appendix E by a hyperlink.
Page 22: line 633 and onwards: Here
I added a hyperlink to Appendix C.
Page 22: line 652 added a hyperlink
to Section 5
Regards, Simon
Simon Holdsworth
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]