[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [sca-bpel] NEW ISSUE: Long-Running Request-Response Operations
TARGET: SCA Client and Implementation Model Specification for WS-BPEL - note that a resolution will likely affect other SCA specifications. DESCRIPTION: Consider a WS-BPEL 2.0 process that implements a service containing a WSDL request-response operation, using an inbound message activity (<receive> or <pick>/<onMessage> or <eventHandlers>/<onEvent>) and a corresponding <reply> activity referencing this operation. Furthermore, assume that there are long-running activities between the inbound message activity and the <reply>. At this point in time, such long-running implementations of request-response operations are NOT SUPPORTED by SCA. As a result, the very first SCA-BPEL goal ("... use any valid WS-BPEL process definition as the implementation of a component within SCA") is NOT MET. Many concrete WS-BPEL scenarios involving such long-running request-response behavior EXIST TODAY - long interrupts may be caused by timer-driven activities and service invocations bound to asynchronous protocols or involving user interactions. Many of these long-running processes expose request-response operations as this is a more convenient modeling style, for example, when the business logic is structured in hierarchies of parent and sub-processes. SCA must support using such processes as implementations of SCA components. As an example, without loss of generality, consider the following very simple <sequence> containing a <wait> activity delaying the response by 14 days (of course, real-world processes would do useful work here instead of calling the <wait> activity :-). <sequence> <receive ... operation="rrOperation" .../> <wait><for>'P14D'</for></wait> <reply ... operation="rrOperation" .../> </sequence> The SCA implementation as well as a caller of this operation should be made aware of the long-running behavior. Note that inspecting the process implementation is not sufficient as the long-running nature of activities may not be visible in the process model. Regardless of the structure of the SCA assembly (component/service directly/transitively wired within/across composites), an SCA implementation would want to execute calls to this operation using some asynchronous means internally. PROPOSAL: ********** To Be Discussed ********** A "longRunning" intent is introduced (policy-related details tbd.), which indicates the long-running behavior of an operation: <operation name="rrOperation" ... requires="sca:longRunning"/> Its runtime semantics are defined by the following naming convention - a request-response operation (with the "longRunning" intent): <wsdl:operation name="rrOperation" ...> <wsdl:input ... message="x:inputMessage"/> <wsdl:output ... message="x:outputMessage"/> <wsdl:fault name="fault1" message="x:fault1Message"/> <wsdl:fault name="fault2" message="x:fault2Message"/> ... </wsdl:operation> is executed AS IF it was specified as a one-way operation (delivering the request): <wsdl:operation name="rrOperationRequest" ...> <wsdl:input ... message="x:inputMessage"/> </wsdl:operation> AND a set of one-way callback operations (delivering the response or fault): <wsdl:operation name="rrOperationResponse" ...> <wsdl:input ... message="x:outputMessage"/> </wsdl:operation> <wsdl:operation name="rrOperationFault1" ...> <wsdl:input message="x:fault1Message"/> </wsdl:operation> <wsdl:operation name="rrOperationFault2" ...> <wsdl:input message="x:fault2Message"/> </wsdl:operation> ... This naming convention enables an SCA implementation to execute a long-running request-response operation in exactly the same way as the corresponding one-way operations defined in a bidirectional interface. All existing SCA means (Java APIs etc.) for bidirectional interfaces can be reused and no new APIs are required. The following rules apply to SCA services and references: (1) Attach a "longRunning" intent to a request-response operation in a component's service if and only if its implementation exposes the long-running behavior described above. (2) Attach a "longRunning" intent to a request-response operation in a component's reference if and only if its invocation exposes the long-running behavior described above. (3) Interfaces of references and services are considered compatible (eligible for wiring) if both sides match w.r.t. the "longRunning" intent on their contained operations. Kind Regards DK
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]