Re: [sca-bpel] Issue 14: we forgot intents

[Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>]

I like it. No reason to create a new attribute (it is a global attr decl 
in SCA schema). This means WSDL and BPEL would use the same extension 
attribute with the same semantics.

-Anish
--

Michael Rowley wrote:
> Perhaps we should have a single @sca:requires attribute, which goes on
> partnerLinks, whose contents are the same as the contents of a service
> or reference @requires attribute.  The semantic of the attribute would
> be that it is translated directly into a @requires attribute on the
> service or reference that is generated for the partnerLink.
> 
> How does that sound?
> 
> Michael
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 12:06 PM
> To: OASIS BPEL
> Subject: [sca-bpel] Issue 14: we forgot intents
> 
> We resolved issue 14 on today's call, but right after the call ended I 
> realized that we did not define an extension for specifying intends in 
> the BPEL process. In a previous call we had informally agreed that 
> specifying intends in the process made sense. Issue 14 is not just about
> 
> services and references but about everything that can be specified in 
> the process.
> 
> -Anish
> --
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in
> OASIS
> at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 
>