Scribe: Danny van der Rijn
Add to agenda - Higher bar for new issues - under AOB
Agenda approved with one addition
Approval of July 10 minutes
Resolution: July 10 minutes located at http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bpel/200807/msg00020.html approved unanimously
Action Item followup
AI #21 Still working with Mary to get CD01 posted. Working through details
Put down the pen, who picks it up?
Dieter has completed the AI with a new upload before Michael Rowley's last upload
Schedule of next calls
I'm currently available for all dates in August
time to give ourselves a vacation
Moves that the TC takes August off. Dieter seconds
Resolution: All August calls are cancelled (motion passes unanimously)
Action: chairs to cancel all august calls
Leaves of absence
See forwarded email about leaves of absence - must inform chairs 7 days in advance, etc.
Status of Spec
Editing work item list is here:
Revision #9 - Michael Rowley mentioned in mail that some of his 2.1 editing got lost, reinserted.
TC has not approved yet, so resolution should be folded in without RFC 2119 language
Revision 9 includes proposal for what 2119 language would look like in section 2.1. Could remove, or could approve.
Martin is to fold in two and twenty issues
Here is an aexample from Policy TC:
[Discussion of process of creating documents]
in Rev 9, which lines do we look at?
I dont know which lines to lok at...
small typo (repeated a few times) "If a partnerLink specifies has..." (pick either 'specifies' or 'has')
I agree Danny - that occurs more than once
Strike the word 'has'
I can't see "Rev5" in the document web page
I can see "Rev9"
It might be easier to state that what is described is the introspected componentType
leaving out the question of how it is actually created
componenttype is virtual but it is also testable
this is equally true for the introspected component type of any implementation type - including Java
Michael Rowley moves that Revision 9, section 2.1 be accepted as the resolution of issue 18 for all of section 2.1
I object as I have not had an opportunity to read it all and I can see several errors already
Someone is typing too close to their microphone
in other places, we iron out wordsmithing details before we make motions
Motion is allowed. We've had a lot of time to review. Michael made motion to focus issues. Running out of time, so it
may be a moot point
would vote against - text is not ready
Beyond the extra 'has', what other errors?
Wrong namespace for attributes
I think the namespace is correct
I think my line just dropped - sorry
do we have time for me to redial?
No, Mike, we're finishing
ok, sorry about that
I will read the whole section and put comments to the list
Between now and next call, look at revision 5 (will send email to point) and urge everyone to send in comments before call,
so we can have a focused discussion next week. Hoping to get resolved next week.
Rev5 and NOT Rev9, right?
Correct, Mike. Rev 5. Anish will send mail.
Schreiber diagnostics output
[Delete this section before publishing the minutes]
statistics: Schreiber found 88 input lines
edits: Schreiber found the following text-edit commands:
edits: Line 44: Danny van der Rijn: s/uploda/upload/
command-scribe: Line 1: Danny van der Rijn recognized
command-scribe: Schreiber detected that this section was scribed online
edit-substitute: command on line 44 succeeded, changed line 42 from 'uploda' to 'upload'
edit-delete: Line 44 was deleted
system: Transformer: SAXON 188.8.131.52
[End of Schreiber diagnostic output]