Minutes
Agenda bashing
Approval of July 24 minutes ...
No objections - minutes approved
Resolution: Minutes of 2008-07-24 located at http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bpel/200807/msg00031.html approved
Review of open action items ...
AI 0021 - Anish will send one more reminder to Mary w.r.t. the remaining pieces
AI 0042 - two more issue resolutions to be applied to the spec - Martin has the pen
higher bar for new issues ...
Proposed for other SCA TCs as well
Proposed approach - first set a higher bar for opening new issues
TC to decide on a date and concrete approach for the higher bar
Anish:
SCA-J TC decided to set the date to September 15
(August is not appropriate due to the vacation season)
Proposed approach - require 2/3 majority for opening new issues
Dieter:
motion to set the date to September 15 and require 2/3 majority for opening new issues - Mike R. seconds
this means 2/3 of voters present in the call
Martin:
motion to change this to 2/3 of ALL voting members
(2/3 of ALL voting members would be consistent across SCA TCs)
<anish>
should we then do web ballots for new issues?
Mike R:
2/3 of ALL voting members may not be reached with a unanimous vote of a quorate meeting
Voting on the amendment ...
<Mike Edwards>
+1 for the motion
Y = 2/3 of ALL voting members
Voting result - 8 Y, 1 N - amendment accepted
Motion is therefore: set the date to September 15 and require 2/3 majority of all voting members for opening new issues
Motion passed without objections
Resolution: After sept 15, 2/3 majority of all voting members for opening new issues will be required
Issue 18
<Mike Edwards>
The "combination" process is the subject of an issue in the Assembly TC
Mike R:
a conformance target "SCA runtime" would include design time
Martin:
concentrate on the rules to be followed
Anish:
the SCA component type is not an "output artifact"
Danny:
we should use the "component type generator" conformance target
<Mike Edwards>
The other C&Is are in poor shape - I will be raising an issue against the Java TC for the CAA spe
Sanjay:
(1) there may be multiple component type side files (2) what should be the name of the conformance target? (3) how to test
compliance?
Sanjay:
how about "component type information" as a candidate target?
Anish:
this would be too abstract as you cannot point to it
Mike E:
the test would consider an SCA component definition and a BPEL process definition - this must work
Mike R:
the component type and the introspected implementation must not be in conflict
<Mike Edwards>
Again, Michael R's testcase is a straighforward testcase
<Mike Edwards>
I just think it is the runtime that is tested here
Danny:
both SCDL and BPEL may be valid by themselves, but the relationship is not
<Mike Edwards>
The testcase is simple - it is a SCDL file + a BPEL script - it is either valid or it is not valid - and whichever runtime
deals with the combination must get it right - process it or reject it with an error
<anish>
i agree, the issues is if it is rejected, what is at fault?
<Mike Edwards>
the runtime
<Mike Edwards>
what else is there
Mike R:
motion to use proposal in revision 5 section 2.1
No second - motion rejected
<anish>
i think there are three cases: either the runtime is at fault, or the scdl is a fault or the CT side file is at fault
Please send new proposals to the mailing list ...
No call in August - next call September 4
Schreiber diagnostics output
[Delete this section before publishing the minutes]
statistics: Schreiber found 95 input lines
edits: Schreiber found the following text-edit commands:
edits: Line 97: Dieter Koenig: s/vore/vote
command-scribe: Line 1: Dieter Koenig recognized
command-scribe: Schreiber detected that this section was scribed online
citation-detection-irc1: Line 20: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'http'
citation-detection-irc1: Line 28: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'http'
citation-detection-irc1: Line 31: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'http'
citation-detection-irc1: Line 42: Check for possible unrecognized nick '7. Issue 18 http'
citation-detection-irc1: Line 45: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'Email discussion'
citation-detection-irc1: Line 46: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'http'
citation-detection-irc1: Line 47: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'http'
citation-detection-irc1: Line 48: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'http'
edit-substitute: command on line 97 succeeded, changed line 95 from 'vore' to 'vote'
edit-delete: Line 97 was deleted
system: Transformer: SAXON 9.0.0.2
[End of Schreiber diagnostic output]