Re: ISSUE 18: Proposed 2119 text for section 2.1

[Michael Rowley <michael.rowley@activevos.com>]

BTW, I unfortunately will not be able to attend tomorrow's call.

This is just my attempt at representing the approach to the text that we 
discussed on the previous call.  I am not wedded to it.  The group 
should feel free to modify it as you see fit.  Don't hold up any work on 
this for my sake.

Michael

Michael Rowley wrote:
>
> Here is my proposal for section 2.1.  It is similar to previous 
> attempts, but has been reworked to state its requirements in terms of 
> what the "introspected component type" should look like.
>
> Michael
>