OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

sca-bpel message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [sca-bpel] Getting ready for PRD

One more thing:

7) Since the PRD will also be CD02, the list of issues that can be 
closed if CD02 is accepted is:
1, 2, 3, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22, 23, 24, 25, 27, 28, 29


Anish Karmarkar wrote:
> Few things we need to agree on for PRD:
> 1) Following SCA Policy's lead, I would like to solicit 
> ideas/suggestions for compiling a list of external stakeholders so that 
> OASIS knows whom to inform as part of initiating and publishing the 
> public review of the SCA BPEL spec. (Note that the BPEL TC has closed, 
> so they can't be in the list of external stakeholders.
> 2) Duration of the public review: OASIS process requires the 1st PR to 
> be minimum of 60 days. I would like to suggest that we stick with the 
> minimum.
> 3) Do we need any change to the namespaces that we use?
> a) http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/opencsa/sca/200712
> b) http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/opencsa/sca-bpel/200801
> OR do we want to continue to use the same namespace as CD01?
> 4) How to deal with issues raised during the PR period either by TC 
> members or non-TC members?
> Per the process, the TC must acknowledge the receipt of each comment, 
> track the comments received, and publish to its primary e-mail list the 
> disposition of each comment at the end of the review period.
> I would like to suggest that we follow SCA Policy TC's lead. Which is to 
>  create a new component/subcomponent in JIRA for PR comments. All new 
> issues raised, after we agree on the PRD, either by non-members or 
> members (on the TC list or the PR feedback list) be logged as new issues 
> in the new component/subcomponent.
> 5) What should be in the PR package?
> a) CD02/PRD with no change mark: html, pdf and word
> b) CD02/PRD with change marks from CD01: do we need all three formats or 
> pdf is sufficient?
> c) Two schema files
> d) RDDL document for the 'sca-bpel' namespace
> 6) We'll have to coordinate with the Assembly TC for appropriate RDDL 
> updates for the 'sca' namespace.
> Did I miss anything?
> Thanks.
> -Anish
> -- 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]