[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sca-bpel] [Issue 34] Incorrect uses of RFC 2119 'MAY' in SBPEL3017
This is now issue 34. http://osoa.org/jira/browse/BPEL-34 Patil, Sanjay wrote: > > Title: Incorrect uses of RFC 2119 'MAY' in SBPEL3017 > > Target: SCA BPEL spec > > Description: > The RFC 2119 guideline for using the word 'MAY' is: > This word, or the adjective "OPTIONAL", mean that an item is > truly optional. One vendor may choose to include the item because a > particular marketplace requires it or because the vendor feels that > it enhances the product while another vendor may omit the same item. > > SBPEL3017 reads as: To explicitly map a partner link to a reference, the > sca-bpel:reference attribute MAY be specified for the partner link. > > The word 'MAY' in this statement is intended to point out a feature that > is available for users of the products implementing the specification > and is not intended to point out the optionality from a vendor > implementation point of view. > > > Proposal: > Change SBPEL3017 to read as: > To explicitly map a partner link to a reference, the sca-bpel:reference > attribute is specified for the partner link. >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]